U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

The CBHSQ Report. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2013-.

Tobacco Cessation Services

, Ph.D., MSW.

Author Information and Affiliations

Published: September 19, 2013.

Background: An estimated 22% of U.S. adults are current cigarette smokers. Smoking prevalence rates for those in substance abuse treatment (SAT) exceeded 70% between 2005 & 2009. Individuals in SAT smoke more heavily than the general population, and consequently are more likely to suffer from tobacco-related morbidity, including cardiopulmonary problems, emphysema, and cancer, than are smokers in the general population. Methods: Data from the 2011 National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), an annual survey of all known substance abuse treatment facilities, both public and private in the U.S., was analyzed. Facilities offering "any" tobacco cessation service (TCS) provided any one or a combination of the following services: tobacco cessation counseling, nicotine replacement medication, and/or non-nicotine tobacco cessation medication were included in this analysis. Results: In 2011, 5,737 SAT facilities, 42% of all such facilities in the U.S., offered TCS. 58% of facilities located in the Northeast offered TCS compared with 40% of facilities in the West, 38% of facilities in the South, and 34% of facilities in the Midwest. 44% of SAT facilities that offered TCS prohibited smoking anywhere compared with facilities that did not offer these services (27%). 72% of SAT facilities that offered any type of TCS provided screening for tobacco use, compared to 34% of facilities that did not offer TCS. Conclusion: TCS provide important benefits that can improve the short- and long-term health of clients in SAT and can enhance drug and alcohol treatment outcomes. Yet this report shows that less than half of treatment facilities nationwide provide TCS. Notably, the Census regions with the heaviest rates of smoking and tobacco-related mortality and morbidity - the Midwest and South - are the regions in which facilities are least likely to offer TCS. Compared with other regions, the Northeast has more treatment facilities that offer TCS, are operated by the Federal Government, or have a primary general health care focus. Many of these findings are expected given the policies that typically prohibit tobacco use in hospitals, other health care facilities, and Federal and some State government facilities.

Keywords:

tobacco cessation services, substance abuse treatment, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services, N-SSATS

In Brief

  • In 2011, 5,737 substance abuse treatment facilities—less than half (42 percent) of all such facilities nationwide—offered tobacco cessation services
  • Over half of facilities located in the Northeast (58 percent) offered tobacco cessation services compared with 40 percent of facilities in the West, 38 percent of facilities in the South, and 34 percent of facilities in the Midwest
  • A larger percentage of substance abuse treatment facilities (44 percent) that offered tobacco cessation services prohibited smoking anywhere compared with facilities that did not offer these services (27 percent)
  • Nearly three fourths (72 percent) of substance abuse treatment facilities that offered any type of tobacco cessation service provided screening for tobacco use, compared to 34 percent of facilities that did not offer tobacco cessation services

Introduction

Tobacco is a highly addictive substance with well-documented health risks. Although great progress has been made in reducing and preventing tobacco use in the United States,1 the rates of cigarette use and dependence remain high in certain subpopulations, including those with substance use disorders. For example, 2011 data show that an estimated 22 percent of U.S. adults are current cigarette smokers,2 whereas smoking prevalence rates for those in substance abuse treatment exceeded 70 percent between 2005 and 2009.3 The negative health effects of tobacco use among alcohol- and drug-dependent individuals can be substantial. Individuals in substance abuse treatment smoke more heavily than the general population, and consequently are more likely to suffer from tobacco-related morbidity, including cardiopulmonary problems, emphysema, and cancer, than are smokers in the general population.4 One study of substance abuse treatment clients found that tobacco use caused more deaths than the alcohol or drug use that brought them to treatment; specifically, the rate of death among tobacco users was nearly 1.5 times the rate of death from other addiction-related causes.5

A growing body of studies has dispelled the common notions that (1) tobacco cessation efforts compromise the treatment and sobriety of persons who are working on recovery from alcohol or drug abuse, and (2) clients in treatment are not interested in quitting tobacco use.6,7 Tobacco cessation services have been found, for example, to be associated with a 25 percent increase in maintaining long-term abstinence from alcohol and illicit drugs.7 Moreover, surveys of treatment populations show that 44 to 80 percent are interested in tobacco cessation.7 Thus, the substance abuse treatment setting offers a good opportunity to introduce tobacco cessation services to clients because these services complement drug and alcohol treatment and benefit overall health.8 The goal of this report is to identify how many facilities offer tobacco cessation services as a part of substance abuse treatment, determine how they are distributed geographically, and highlight other important characteristics of these programs. Comparisons will be made with those facilities that did not offer any tobacco cessation services.

The National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), an annual survey of all known substance abuse treatment facilities, both public and private, provides information on the numbers of facilities that provide tobacco cessation services. Facilities offering "any" tobacco cessation service provided any one or a combination of the following services in 2011: tobacco cessation counseling, nicotine replacement medication, and/or non-nicotine tobacco cessation medication.

Note that N-SSATS is a census of all treatment facilities in the United States. Because N-SSATS involves actual counts rather than estimates, statistical significance and confidence intervals are not applicable. The differences mentioned in the text of this report have Cohen's h effect size ≥ 0.20, indicating that they are considered to be meaningful.

Overview

In 2011, 5,737 substance abuse treatment facilities—less than half (42 percent) of all such facilities nationwide—offered tobacco cessation services (Figure 1). Specifically, 34 percent of all facilities offered tobacco cessation counseling, 21 percent offered nicotine replacement medication, and 16 percent offered non-nicotine tobacco cessation medication.

In 2011, 42 substance abuse treatment facilities offered any tobacco cessation service, 34 offered smoking cessation counseling, 21 offered nicotine replacement pharmacotherapy, and 16 offered non-nicotine tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy.

Figure 1

Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities Offering Tobacco Cessation Services: 2011

Geographic Differences

The proportions of substance abuse treatment facilities offering tobacco cessation services differed by Census region, and there were several notable differences at the State level as well (Figure 2). Over half of facilities located in the Northeast (58 percent) offered tobacco cessation services compared with 40 percent of facilities in the West, 38 percent of facilities in the South, and 34 percent of facilities in the Midwest. The higher percentage of facilities offering tobacco cessation services in the Northeast were primarily driven by two States. Specifically, 83 percent of facilities in New York offered tobacco cessation services, and 73 percent of those in Massachusetts did. Arkansas and Wyoming also had high percentages of treatment facilities offering tobacco cessation services; the proportions in these States were about double that of their respective regional averages (80 percent in Arkansas vs. 38 percent in the South, and 72 percent in Wyoming vs. 40 percent in the West).

In the Midwest region in 2011, 34% of substance abuse treatment facilities offered any tobacco cessation services, with 29% in Illinois, 44% in Indiana, 31% in Iowa, 29% in Kansas, 32% in Michigan, 32% in Minnesota, 35% in Missouri, 33% in Nebraska, 34% in North Dakota, 36% in Ohio, 41% in South Dakota, and 44% in Wisconsin. In the Northeast region in 2011, 58% of substance abuse treatment facilities offered any tobacco cessation services, with 48% in Connecticut, 36% in Maine, 73% in Massachusetts, 41% in New Hampshire, 42% in New Jersey, 83% in New York, 35% in Pennsylvania, 42% in Rhode Island, and 67% in Vermont. In the South region in 2011, 38% of substance abuse treatment facilities offered any tobacco cessation services, with 23% in Alabama, 80% in Arkansas, 51% in Delaware, 31% in Washington, DC, 39% in Florida, 33% in Georgia, 28% in Kentucky, 39% in Louisiana, 38% in Maryland, 32% in Mississippi, 40% in North Carolina, 47% in Oklahoma, 49% in South Carolina, 34% in Tennessee, 44% in Texas, 38% in Virginia, and 27% in West Virginia. In the West region in 2011, 40% of substance abuse treatment facilities offered any tobacco cessation services, with 49% in Alaska, 34% in Arizona, 36% in California, 34% in Colorado, 57% in Hawaii, 32% in Idaho, 32% in Montana, 34% in Nevada, 40% in New Mexico, 55% in Oregon, 59% in Utah, 46% in Washington, and 72% in Wyoming.

Figure 2

Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities Offering Any Tobacco Cessation Services, by Census Region and by State: 2011

Facility Operation

A larger proportion of substance abuse treatment facilities operated by Federal Government agencies offered tobacco cessation services than that of all other facilities. Specifically, 80 percent of facilities operated by the Federal Government offered tobacco cessation services, compared with just over half (51 percent) of those operated by State governments and more than one third (34 percent) of those operated by private for-profit organizations (Figure 3).

In 2011, 80% of federal government substance abuse treatment facilities, 51% of state government facilities, 45% of local government facilities, 44% of private non-profit facilities, 41% of tribal government facilities, and 34% of private for profit facilities offered tobacco cessation services.

Figure 3

Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities Offering Tobacco Cessation Services, by Facility Operation: 2011

Primary Therapeutic Focus

The majority (81 percent) of substance abuse treatment facilities with a primary general health care focus (usually facilities located within hospitals) offered tobacco cessation services (Figure 4). These facilities offered tobacco cessation services at a higher rate than those with a primary focus on both substance abuse and mental health services (46 percent), mental health services only (42 percent), or substance abuse services only (39 percent).

In 2011, 81% of general health care facilities, 46% of mixed substance abuse and mental health service facilities, 42% of mental health service facilities, 39% of substance abuse service facilities, and 37% of other facilities offered tobacco cessation services.

Figure 4

Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities Offering Tobacco Cessation Services, by Primary Therapeutic Focus: 2011

Smoking Policy

The 2011 N-SSATS survey included questions about a facility's smoking policy. About one third (34 percent) of substance abuse treatment facilities reported that they prohibited smoking on site (i.e., did not allow smoking anywhere), 54 percent reported that they permitted smoking outside only, and 10 percent reported they permitted smoking outside and in designated areas only. The remainder reported some other policy or had an invalid or missing response to this question.

A larger percentage of substance abuse treatment facilities (44 percent) that offered tobacco cessation services prohibited smoking anywhere compared with facilities that did not offer these services (27 percent) (Figure 5). Less than half of facilities that offered tobacco cessation services (45 percent) permitted smoking outdoors but not indoors—this was a lower percentage than for facilities that did not offer tobacco cessation services (62 percent).

For substance abuse treatment facilities offering any tobacco cessation service in 2011, 44% do not permit smoking anywhere, 45% permit smoking outdoors only, and 10% permit smoking outdoors and in designated indoor areas. For substance abuse treatment facilities not offering any tobacco cessation service in 2011, 27% do not permit smoking anywhere, 62% permit smoking outdoors only, and 11% permit smoking outdoors and in designated indoor areas.

Figure 5

Substance Abuse Treatment Facility Smoking Policies, by Tobacco Cessation Services: 2011

Screening for Tobacco Use

The 2011 N-SSATS asked about screening for tobacco use during assessment and/or as a pretreatment service. Half (50 percent) of substance abuse treatment facilities reported that they screened for tobacco use (Figure 6), more than one third (38 percent) reported that they did not screen, and the remainder (12 percent) had either an invalid or missing response to this question. Nearly three fourths (72 percent) of substance abuse treatment facilities that offered any type of tobacco cessation service provided screening for tobacco use, compared to 34 percent of facilities that did not offer tobacco cessation services.

In 2011, 50% of all substance abuse treatment facilities provide screening for tobacco use, 72% of substance abuse treatment facilities providing screening for tobacco use offer any tobacco cessation service, and 34% of substance abuse treatment facilities providing screening for tobacco use offer no tobacco cessation service.

Figure 6

Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities Providing Screening for Tobacco Use, by Tobacco Cessation Services: 2011

Discussion

Tobacco cessation services provide important benefits that can improve the short- and long-term health of clients in substance abuse treatment and can enhance drug and alcohol treatment outcomes.6,7 Yet this report shows that less than half of treatment facilities nationwide provide tobacco cessation services. Notably, the Census regions with the heaviest rates of smoking and tobacco-related mortality and morbidity—the Midwest and South—are the regions in which facilities are least likely to offer tobacco cessation services.1 Compared with other regions, the Northeast has more treatment facilities that offer tobacco cessation services, are operated by the Federal Government, or have a primary general health care focus (Table 1). Many of these findings are expected given the policies that typically prohibit tobacco use in hospitals, other health care facilities, and Federal and some State government facilities. New York, for example, prohibits smoking in State-owned substance abuse treatment facilities and requires that all treatment centers help their patients to quit smoking.9

Table 1. Summary of Differences Found between Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities That Do Offer and Those That Do Not Offer Tobacco Cessation Services: 2011*.

Table 1

Summary of Differences Found between Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities That Do Offer and Those That Do Not Offer Tobacco Cessation Services: 2011*.

Treatment programs that do not screen for tobacco use or offer tobacco cessation services should be encouraged to implement these services as an important, complementary adjunct to substance abuse treatment and to meet an important public health need. To that end, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has developed resources for implementing tobacco use cessation during substance abuse treatment.

Please see the following documents that are available on the SAMHSA website:

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has also developed general counseling recommendations to prevent tobacco use and tobacco-caused disease for adults and pregnant women (see http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf09/tobacco/tobaccors2.htm). Clinicians who work in treatment programs without formal tobacco cessation programs or services may refer interested clients to 1-800-QUIT-NOW or http://www.smokefree.gov.

Suggested Citation

Smith, K. Tobacco Cessation Services. Highlights of the National Mental Health Services Survey, 2010. The CBHSQ Report: September 19, 2013. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD.

Footnotes

1

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011, September 9). Vital Signs: Current cigarette smoking among adults aged ≥ 18 years—United States, 2005-2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 60(35), 1207-1212. Retrieved from http://www​.cdc.gov/mmwr​/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6035a5​.htm?s_cid=%20mm6035a5.htm_w [PubMed: 21900875]

2

Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2012). Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings (HHS Publication No. SMA 12-4713, NSDUH Series H-44). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

3

Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2011, June 23). The NSDUH Report: Nicotine dependence among persons who received substance use treatment. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

4

Burling T. A., Ramsey T. G., Seidner A. L., Kondo C. S. (1997). Issues related to smoking cessation among substance abusers. Journal of Substance Abuse, 9, 27-40. 10.1016/S0899-3289(97)90004-3 [PubMed: 9494937] [CrossRef]

5

Hurt R. D., Offord K. P., Croghan I. T., Gomez-Dahl L., Kottke T. E., Morse R. M., Melton L. J. (1996). Mortality following inpatient addictions treatment: Role of tobacco use in a community-based cohort. JAMA, 275(14), 1097-1103. 10.1001/jama.1996.03530380039029 [PubMed: 8601929] [CrossRef]

6

Baca C. T., Yahne C. E. (2009). Smoking cessation during substance abuse treatment: What you need to know. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36(2), 205-219. 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.003 [PubMed: 18715746] [CrossRef]

7

Prochaska J. J., Delucchi K., Hall S. M. (2004). A meta-analysis of smoking cessation interventions with individuals in substance abuse treatment or recovery. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(6), 1144-1156. 10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1144 [PubMed: 15612860] [CrossRef]

8

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). The health consequences of smoking: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. [PubMed: 20669512]

9

New York State Office of Alcoholism & Substance Abuse Services (NYS OASAS). (2008, July 24). Regulations for tobacco-free services, Title 14, NYCRR Part 856. Retrieved from http://www​.oasas.ny.gov​/tobacco/providers​/documents/Part856reg.pdf

Copyright Notice

All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA. Citation of the source is appreciated. However, this publication may not be reproduced or distributed for a fee without the specific, written authorization of the Office of Communications, SAMHSA, HHS.

Bookshelf ID: NBK384677PMID: 27631056

Views

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...