U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007-.

  • This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

Cover of Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians

Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians [Internet].

Show details

Comparing Medications for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

.

Author Information and Affiliations

Issued: .

Focus of Research for Clinicians

A systematic review of 166 clinical studies published between January 1966 and April 2010 examined the comparative effectiveness, benefits, and adverse effects of available monotherapy and two-drug combinations of medications for adults with type 2 diabetes (see list of type 2 diabetes medications studied). The review did not cover treatment of type 1 diabetes or gestational diabetes nor does it review evidence regarding the effectiveness of diet, exercise, and weight loss. The full report, listing all studies, is available at http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/diabetesmeds.cfm. This summary, based on the full report of research evidence, is provided to inform discussions with patients of options and to assist in decisionmaking along with consideration of a patient’s values and preferences. However, reviews of evidence should not be construed to represent clinical recommendations or guidelines.

Type 2 Diabetes Medications Studied by Class With Abbreviations.

Table

Type 2 Diabetes Medications Studied by Class With Abbreviations.

Background Information

The management of hyperglycemia is an important focus of treatment to achieve improved macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Controlling blood-glucose levels often requires several strategies, including weight loss if needed, dietary control, increased physical activity, and antidiabetic medications.1

Treatment regimens include single drugs and combinations of drugs from different classes. Choosing among the available medications requires consideration of benefits, adverse effects, mechanism of action, and cost. In 2007, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality published its first systematic review on the comparative effectiveness of oral medications for type 2 diabetes. The 2011 update includes newer medications and two-drug combinations.

Conclusion

Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of antidiabetic medications for long-term macrovascular and microvascular outcomes is limited. However, evidence is available on intermediate outcomes. Many antidiabetic medications given as monotherapy work equally well to lower blood glucose. Two-drug combinations decrease hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) further. Most agents (except metformin [MET] and glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] receptor agonists) are associated with increases in weight. The risk of mild to moderate hypoglycemia varies—it is highest for second-generation sulfonylureas (SU) and is increased for some two-drug combinations over monotherapy. MET may cause gastrointestinal (GI) upset. A United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning indicates that thiazolidinediones (TZD) are associated with increased risks for cardiac failure, cardiovascular events, hip and nonhip fractures, and other risks in some patients. Tables 1, 2, and 3 summarize evidence about benefits, adverse events, and long-term benefits.

Clinical Outcomes Table 1. Benefits.

Clinical Outcomes Table 1

Benefits. (Findings followed by evidence on specific comparisons.)

Clinical Outcomes Table 2. Adverse Events.

Clinical Outcomes Table 2

Adverse Events. (Findings followed by evidence on specific comparisons.)

Clinical Outcomes Table 3. Long-Term Benefits.

Clinical Outcomes Table 3

Long-Term Benefits. (Findings followed by evidence on specific comparisons.) Studies examining long-term benefits were limited. Only low levels of evidence were available for long-term outcomes (except as noted below for Pio, which may provide benefit (more...)

Clinical Bottom Line

(Detailed comparisons: Tables 1, 2, 3)

Glycemic Control (HbA1c)

  • On average, many of the single agents reduce HbA1c levels by 1 percentage point ( Image clindiabmedf3.jpg to Image clindiabmedf4.jpg).
  • On average, two-drug combination therapies reduce HbA1c about 1 percentage point more than monotherapies ( Image clindiabmedf3.jpg to Image clindiabmedf4.jpg).
  • Some two-drug combinations are equally effective ( Image clindiabmedf3.jpg) and others, though less studied, show promise ( Image clindiabmedf2.jpg).

Weight

  • MET monotherapy was associated with less weight gain when compared with other monotherapies or two-drug combinations ( Image clindiabmedf3.jpg to Image clindiabmedf4.jpg).
  • When compared to second-generation sulfonylureas (SUs), GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with less weight gain ( Image clindiabmedf3.jpg).
  • The combination MET/SU was associated with less weight gain than were two-drug combinations with TZDs ( Image clindiabmedf3.jpg).
  • Some newer agents in two-drug combinations show promise for lower levels of weight gain ( Image clindiabmedf2.jpg).

Risk of Adverse Effects

  • SUs and meglitinides (MEG) are more likely to cause mild to moderate hypoglycemia than monotherapy with MET, TZD, or a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor ( Image clindiabmedf3.jpg to Image clindiabmedf4.jpg).
  • When compared to MET monotherapy, two-drug combinations with MET increase the risk of mild to moderate hypoglycemia, except for MET/DPP-4 inhibitor combinations ( Image clindiabmedf3.jpg).
  • MET is associated with more GI adverse events when compared with other single agents ( Image clindiabmedf3.jpg to Image clindiabmedf4.jpg).
  • TZDs are associated with a higher risk of congestive heart failure when compared with SUs ( Image clindiabmedf3.jpg). (See FDA Alerts for TZDs.)
  • TZDs alone or in combination are associated with a higher risk of hip and nonhip fractures when compared with other agents ( Image clindiabmedf3.jpg).
  • FDA warnings indicate that TZDs are associated with increased risks for cardiac failure, cardiovascular events, fractures, and other risks. (See FDA Alerts for TZDs.)
Strength of Evidence

High: Image clindiabmedf4.jpg There are consistent results from good-quality studies. Further research is very unlikely to change the conclusions.

Moderate: Image clindiabmedf3.jpg Findings are supported, but further research could change the conclusions.

Low: Image clindiabmedf2.jpg There are very few studies, or existing studies are flawed.

Insufficient: Image clindiabmedf1.jpg Evidence either is unavailable or does not permit estimation of an effect.

FDA Alerts for TZDs

According to FDA boxed warnings, TZDs may cause or exacerbate CHF in some patients and are contraindicated in patients with serious or severe heart failure. In 2010, the FDA placed additional prescribing restrictions on rosiglitazone use for type 2 diabetes in response to data that suggested an elevated risk of cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and stroke. In 2011, the FDA released a Safety Announcement that the use of pioglitazone for more than one year may be associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer (for more information visit www.fda.gov).

Gaps in Knowledge

  • Studies are needed to address the efficacy of treatments for hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes who have varying levels of underlying cardiovascular and renal disease, who come from different ethnic groups, or who have variant forms of type 2 diabetes.
  • Additional comparative studies are needed, including comparisons of newer medications, combinations with basal or premixed insulin and MET or other oral agents, and additional two-drug combinations.
  • Sufficient data on event rates are needed to analyze major clinically important outcomes, adverse events, and long-term complications of type 2 diabetes.

Average Wholesale Prices for Diabetes Medicines

Drug Type Price for 1-Month Supply
Generic Brand Dose Generic Brand
Biguanides
MetforminGlucophage®500 mg once a day$25$35
500 mg twice a day$50$70
500 mg three times a day$75$105
850 mg once a day$40$60
850 mg twice a day$80$115
850 mg three times a day$120$175
1,000 mg once a day$45$70
1,000 mg twice a day$90$140
Glucophage XR®500 mg once a day$25$35
1,000 mg once a day$50$70
1,500 mg once a day$75$105
2,000 mg once a day$100$140
Second-Generation Sulfonylureas
GlimepirideAmaryl®1 mg once a day$15$20
2 mg once a day$25$35
4 mg once a day$40$60
8 mg once a day$80$120
GlipizideGlucotrol®5 mg once a day$15$25
10 mg once a day$25$40
10 mg twice a day$50$80
20 mg twice a day$100$160
Glucotrol XL®5 mg once a day$15$25
20 mg once a day$65$90
GlyburideDiabeta®, Micronase®2.5 mg twice a day$40$45
5 mg once a day$30$40
5 mg twice a day$60$80
Glynase PresTab®1.5 mg once a day$9$30
3 mg once a day$18$45
6 mg twice a day$72$145
Meglitinides
RepaglinidePrandin®0.5 mg three times a dayNA$255
1 mg three times a dayNA$255
4 mg three times a dayNA$505
NateglinideStarlix®60 mg three times a dayNA$195
120 mg three times a dayNA$200
Thiazolidinediones
PioglitazoneActos®15 mg once a dayNA$180
30 mg once a dayNA$275
45 mg once a dayNA$300
Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors
SitagliptinJanuvia®100 mg once a dayNA$230
SaxagliptinOnglyza®2.5 mg–5 mg once a dayNA$220
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists
ExenatideByetta®Injection of 5 mcg twice a dayNA$300
Injection of 10 mcg twice a dayNA$330
LiraglutideVictoza®Injection of 0.6 mg once a dayNA$160
Injection of 1.2 mg once a dayNA$315
Injection of 1.8 mg once a dayNA$470

These prices are the Federal median price for generic medicines and the average wholesale price for brand name medicines rounded to the next $5. These prices come from Red Book: Pharmacy’s Fundamental Reference, 2011 Edition.

XR/XL = extended release NA = not available as a generic

What To Discuss With Your Patients

  • Establishing a goal for HbA1c and strategies to help accomplish that goal, including weight loss, exercise, and consistent use of medication.
  • Strategies to increase adherence, including creating a medication schedule, addressing the costs of medications, and reporting adverse effects in a timely manner.
  • The need for regular glucose testing and routine blood tests for HbA1c.
  • What side effects to expect from the chosen medicines, and when to contact you if side effects occur.

Resource for Patients

Medicines for Type 2 Diabetes, A Review of the Research for Adults is a companion to this clinician research summary. It can help people talk to their health care professionals about medications for type 2 diabetes. It provides information about:

  • Types of diabetes medications.
  • The benefits and risks of medications.
  • Costs of medications.

Ordering Information

For electronic copies of Medicines for Type 2 Diabetes, A Review of the Research for Adults, this clinician research summary, and the full systematic review, visit www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/diabetesmeds.cfm. To order free print copies, call the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse at 800-358-9295.

Source

The information in this summary is based on Oral Diabetes Medications for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: An Update, Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 27, prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0018 for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, March 2011. AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC038-EF. Available at: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/diabetesmeds.cfm. This summary was prepared by the John M. Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communications Science at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

Footnotes

1 American Diabetes Association; European Association for the Study of Diabetes

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this page (797K)

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...