Ultrastructural comparison of hydroxyapatite and silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications

J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004 Jan 1;68(1):133-41. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.20064.

Abstract

Silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite (Si-HA) has been shown to lead to significantly increased rates of bone apposition when compared with phase-pure hydroxyapatite (HA) bioceramic implants (Patel N, et al. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:1199-1206). However, uncertainty remains about the mechanism by which Si increases the in vivo bioactivity. In this study, defect structures in Si-HA were observed and characterized for the first time using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Using tilting experiments and the g. b = 0 criterion for invisibility, the Burgers vectors of dislocations in phase-pure HA and 0.8 wt % Si-HA were characterized to be screw and mixed in character. Dislocations were observed in both pure HA and 0.8 wt % Si-HA with no significant difference in dislocation density between HA and Si-HA. However, our findings suggest that an increased number of triple junctions in Si-HA may have a significant role in increasing the solubility of the material and the subsequent rate at which bone apposes Si-HA ceramics.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biocompatible Materials / chemistry*
  • Ceramics
  • Durapatite / chemistry*
  • Microscopy, Electron
  • Prostheses and Implants*
  • Silicon*

Substances

  • Biocompatible Materials
  • Durapatite
  • Silicon