The precision and accuracy of measurements of the diameter and electrophoretic mobility (mu) of polymeric nanoparticles is compared using four different analytical approaches: carbon-nanotube-based Coulter counting, dynamic light scattering (DLS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and phase analysis light scattering (PALS). Carbon-nanotube-based Coulter counters (CNCCs) use a 132 nm diameter channel to simultaneously determine the diameter (28-90 nm) and mu value for individual nanoparticles. These measurements are made without calibration of the CNCC and without labeling the sample. Moreover, because CNCCs measure the properties of individual particles, they provide true averages and polydispersities that are not convoluted into the intrinsic instrumental response function of the CNCC. CNCCs can be used to measure the size of individual nanoparticles dispersed in aqueous solutions, which contrasts with the TEM-measured size of individual dehydrated particles and the ensemble size averages of dispersed particles provided by DLS. CNCCs provide more precise values of mu than PALS.