Progress in understanding conditions for optimal peripheral nerve regeneration has been stunted due to lack of standardization of experimental conditions and assays. In this paper we review the large database that has been generated using the Lundborg nerve chamber model and compare various theories for their ability to explain the experimental data. Data were normalized based on systematic use of the critical axon elongation, the gap length at which the probability of axon reconnection between the stumps is just 50%. Use of this criterion has led to a rank-ordering of devices or treatments and has led, in turn, to conclusions about the conditions that facilitate regeneration. Experimental configurations that have maximized facilitation of peripheral nerve regeneration are those in which the tube wall comprised degradable polymers, including collagen and certain synthetic biodegradable polymers, and was cell-permeable rather than protein-permeable. Tube fillings that showed very high regenerative activity were suspensions of Schwann cells, a solution either of acidic or basic fibroblast growth factor, insoluble ECM substrates rather than solutions or gels, polyamide filaments oriented along the tube axis and highly porous, insoluble analogs of the ECM with specific structure and controlled degradation rate. It is suggested that the data are best explained by postulating that the quality of regeneration depends on two critical processes. The first is compression of stumps and regenerating nerve by a thick myofibroblast layer that surrounds these tissues and blocks synthesis of a nerve of large diameter (pressure cuff theory). The second is synthesis of linear columns of Schwann cells that serve as tracks for axon elongation (basement membrane microtube theory). It is concluded that experimental configurations that show high regenerative activity suppress the first process while facilitating the second.