Validity and reliability of an intuitive conscious sedation scoring tool: the nursing instrument for the communication of sedation

Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug;38(8):1674-84. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e7c73e.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a symmetrical 7-level scale (+3, "dangerously agitated" to -3, "deeply sedated") that is both intuitive and easy to use, the Nursing Instrument for the Communication of Sedation (NICS).

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: University medical center.

Patients: Mixed surgical, medical intensive care unit (ICU) population.

Interventions: Patient assessment.

Measurements and main results: Criterion, construct, face validity, and interrater reliability of NICS over time and comparison of ease of use and nursing preference between NICS and four common intensive care unit sedation scales. A total of 395 observations were performed in 104 patients (20 intubated [INT], 84 non intubated) by 59 intensive care unit providers. Criterion validity was tested comparing NICS WITH the 8-point level of arousal scale, demonstrating excellent correlation (rs = .96 overall, .95 non intubated, 0.85 intubated, all p < .001). Construct validity was confirmed by comparing NICS with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, demonstrating excellent correlation (rs = .98, p < .001). Face validity was determined in a blinded survey of 53 intensive care unit nurses evaluating NICS and four other sedation scales. NICS was highly rated as easy to score, intuitive, and a clinically relevant measure of sedation, and agitation and was preferred overall (74% NICS, 17% Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, 11% Other, p < .001 NICS vs. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale). Interrater reliability was assessed, using the five scales at three timed intervals, during which 37% of patients received sedative medication. The mean NICS score consistently correlated with each of the other scales over time with an rs of >.9. Using the intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of Interrater reliability, NICS scored as high, or higher than Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale, Motor Activity Assessment Scale, or Ramsay over the three time periods.

Conclusion: NICS is a valid and reliable sedation scale for use in a mixed population of intensive care unit patients. NICS ranked highest in nursing preference and ease of communication and may thus permit more effective and interactive management of sedation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cohort Studies
  • Conscious Sedation / classification*
  • Conscious Sedation / nursing*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / administration & dosage
  • Intensive Care Units*
  • Intubation, Intratracheal
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / methods
  • Nurse Anesthetists
  • Nursing Assessment / methods*
  • Observer Variation
  • Prospective Studies
  • Psychometrics
  • Psychomotor Agitation / diagnosis
  • Psychomotor Agitation / therapy*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Hypnotics and Sedatives