Transcultural and psychometric validation of the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15) in Chinese adult women

Qual Life Res. 2014 Nov;23(9):2489-94. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0713-9. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to report translation and transcultural adaptation of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale in traditional Chinese (C-DRS-15) and evaluate its psychometric properties.

Methods: The DRS is a self-report instrument that measures psychological hardiness. We followed an international standard of cross-cultural translation and validation of patient-reported outcome measures to create the Chinese version. Then, the translated C-DRS-15 was validated on 542 Chinese women from a population-based sample in Hong Kong.

Results: The internal consistency and criterion-related validity were investigated. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the C-DRS-15 was supported by a modified three-factor structure in our Chinese sample (RMSEA = .06, CFI = .94, TLI = .92, and SRMR = .06). The reliability (Cronbach's α coefficient = .78) and validity were satisfactory. Total resilience score was negatively correlated with depression (p < .001), with non-depressed women scoring higher on the C-DRS-15.

Conclusions: The C-DRS-15 was demonstrated to be a reliable and valid measurement to assess hardiness in Chinese women.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Asian People
  • Cross-Cultural Comparison
  • Depression
  • Factor Analysis, Statistical
  • Female
  • Hong Kong
  • Humans
  • Mental Disorders
  • Middle Aged
  • Psychometrics*
  • Quality of Life
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Resilience, Psychological* / classification
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards*
  • Young Adult