Diagnostic validity (sensitivity and specificity) of panoramic X-rays in osteoarthrosis of the temporomandibular joint

Cranio. 2015 Jul;33(3):189-94. doi: 10.1179/2151090314Y.0000000018. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

Abstract

Objective: To establish the diagnostic validity of panoramic X-rays (PRx) in temporomandibular osteoarthrosis (OA) using the clinical and imaging criteria (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) as gold standards.

Methods: Eighty-four patients with full clinical records (RDC/TMD), PRx, and MRI scans were selected. Two stomatologists evaluated the PRx for OA. The MRI findings were derived from the radiologist report. Intra/inter-examiner concordance was established. The diagnostic concordance between clinical signs and MRI was determined. Both were used as gold standards to calculate the validity of PRx in OA.

Results: The diagnostic validity of PRx with MRI as gold standard was sensitivity=69.0% and specificity=67.9%. The diagnostic validity of PRx with clinical criteria as gold standard was sensitivity=61.6% and specificity=57.9%.

Discussion: Panoramic X-rays have scant diagnostic validity in temporomandibular osteoarthrosis when taking MRI or clinical criteria of RDC/TMD as gold standards.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoarthrosis,; Panoramic X-rays,; RDC/TMD,; Sensitivity,; Specificity,; Temporomandibular,; Validity,.

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Radiography, Panoramic*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders / diagnostic imaging*