What is a "good" result after transcatheter mitral repair? Impact of 2+ residual mitral regurgitation

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.099. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

Abstract

Objective: The study objective was to assess the impact on follow-up outcomes of residual mitral regurgitation 2+ in comparison with ≤ 1+ after MitraClip (Abbott Vascular Inc, Santa Clara, Calif) repair.

Methods: We compared the outcomes of mitral regurgitation 2+ and mitral regurgitation ≤ 1 + groups among a population of 223 consecutive patients with acute residual mitral regurgitation ≤ 2+ who underwent MitraClip implantation at San Raffaele Scientific Institute (Milan, Italy) between October 2008 and December 2014.

Results: Residual mitral regurgitation 2+ was found in 64 patients (28.7%). Overall actuarial survival was 63.1% ± 4.4% at 48 months. Cumulative incidence functions of cardiac death in patients with mitral regurgitation 2+ was significantly higher (Gray test P < .001) compared with the mitral regurgitation ≤ 1+ group. The adjusted hazard ratio was 5.28 (95% confidence interval, 2.41-11.56, P < .001). Cumulative incidence function of mitral regurgitation ≥ 3+ recurrence in patients with residual mitral regurgitation ≤ 1+ and mitral regurgitation 2+ at 48 months was 13.3% ± 3.8% and 45.2% ± 6.8%, respectively (Gray test P < .001). Multivariate model showed that mitral regurgitation 2+ was the only factor associated with the development of mitral regurgitation ≥ 3+ at follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio, 6.71; 95% confidence interval, 3.48-12.90; P < .001). Mitral regurgitation cause was not associated with cardiac death and recurrence of mitral regurgitation ≥ 3+ at follow-up. No relationship between New York Heart Association class and follow-up time after MitraClip implant was found (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.15; P = .11), and factors related to postoperative New York Heart Association also included residual mitral regurgitation 2+ (P = .07).

Conclusions: Residual 2+ mitral regurgitation after MitraClip implantation was associated with worse follow-up outcomes compared with ≤ 1+ mitral regurgitation, including survival, symptom relief, and mitral regurgitation recurrence. Better efficacy should be pursued by transcatheter mitral repair technologies.

Keywords: MitraClip; mitral regurgitation; repair; transcatheter.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cardiac Catheterization / adverse effects
  • Cardiac Catheterization / instrumentation*
  • Cardiac Catheterization / mortality
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Female
  • Hemodynamics
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Linear Models
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mitral Valve / physiopathology*
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency / diagnosis
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency / mortality
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency / physiopathology
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency / therapy*
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Odds Ratio
  • Recurrence
  • Remission Induction
  • Risk Factors
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome