Background: Differentiating malignancy from benign disease in indeterminate biliary stricture by imaging modalities is limited. Definite diagnosis relies on histopathological diagnosis.
Aims: To assess accuracy of histopathological diagnosis of fluoroscopy-guided vs. cholangioscopy-directed intraductal biopsies in indeterminate biliary stricture.
Methods: All patients with indeterminate biliary stricture and fluoroscopically (n=68) or cholangioscopy-directed (working channel 2mm, n=38) biopsies were included. Histopathological results of biopsies were classified into inflammatory lesion (class 1), dysplasia/intraepithelial neoplasia (class 2) and malignancy (class 3) and results as well as macroscopic diagnosis were compared with final diagnosis.
Results: Sensitivity and specificity of fluoroscopy-guided vs. cholangioscopy-directed biopsies were 22.9% and 100% vs. 25.0% and 100% for class 1+2 vs. class 3 lesions, respectively. Sensitivity for class 1 vs. class 2+3 lesions was 45.7% (p=0.044) vs. 58.3% (p=0.214) for fluoroscopy-guided vs. cholangioscopy-directed biopsies, respectively, while specificity was 100% in both. There was no difference in size of the obtained sample (p=0.992). True positive diagnosis rate increased with the number of biopsies taken (p=0.028).
Conclusion: Fluoroscopy-guided and cholangioscopy-directed intraductal biopsies are equally limited in establishing the diagnosis of malignancy in indeterminate biliary stricture. Categorizing dysplasia or intraepithelial neoplasia as malignancy increases sensitivity without decrease in specificity. By taking more biopsies, diagnostic yield is increased.
Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma; Cholangioscopy; Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); Endoscopy; Indeterminate biliary stricture; Intraductal biopsy.
Copyright © 2016 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.