Energy Sprawl Is the Largest Driver of Land Use Change in United States

PLoS One. 2016 Sep 8;11(9):e0162269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162269. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Energy production in the United States for domestic use and export is predicted to rise 27% by 2040. We quantify projected energy sprawl (new land required for energy production) in the United States through 2040. Over 200,000 km2 of additional land area will be directly impacted by energy development. When spacing requirements are included, over 800,000 km2 of additional land area will be affected by energy development, an area greater than the size of Texas. This pace of development in the United States is more than double the historic rate of urban and residential development, which has been the greatest driver of conversion in the United States since 1970, and is higher than projections for future land use change from residential development or agriculture. New technology now places 1.3 million km2 that had not previously experienced oil and gas development at risk of development for unconventional oil and gas. Renewable energy production can be sustained indefinitely on the same land base, while extractive energy must continually drill and mine new areas to sustain production. We calculated the number of years required for fossil energy production to expand to cover the same area as renewables, if both were to produce the same amount of energy each year. The land required for coal production would grow to equal or exceed that of wind, solar and geothermal energy within 2-31 years. In contrast, it would take hundreds of years for oil production to have the same energy sprawl as biofuels. Meeting energy demands while conserving nature will require increased energy conservation, in addition to distributed renewable energy and appropriate siting and mitigation.

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture*
  • Conservation of Energy Resources*
  • Electricity
  • Renewable Energy
  • Risk
  • Time Factors

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Nature Conservancy’s NatureNet Science Fellows program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.