Reliability and Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test With a Motor Task in People With Chronic Stroke

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Nov;98(11):2213-2220. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine (1) the intra-rater, interrater, and test-retest reliabilities of the timed Up and Go test with a motor task (TUGmotor) in terms of the number of steps taken in the test and completion time in a population with chronic stroke; (2) the relation between stroke-specific impairments and the number of steps taken in the test and the completion time; (3) the minimum detectable change in TUGmotor times; and (4) the cutoff time that best discriminates the performance of people with stroke from that of older adults without stroke.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: University-based rehabilitation center.

Participants: A sample (N=65) of chronic stroke survivors (n=33) and healthy older adults (n=32).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: TUGmotor times and number of steps taken; Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Lower Extremities score; handheld dynamometer measurements of hip abductor, knee flexor and extensor, and ankle dorsiflexor and plantar flexor muscle strength; 5-times sit-to-stand test time, Berg Balance Scale score; conventional timed Up and Go test time, and Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale and Community Integration Measure questionnaire scores.

Results: The TUGmotor completion times and number of steps demonstrated excellent intra-rater, interrater, and test-retest reliabilities. The TUGmotor times correlated significantly with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Lower Extremities and Berg Balance Scale scores, with hip abductor, knee flexor, ankle dorsiflexor and plantar flexor strength on the paretic side, with 5-times sit-to-stand test times, and with times on the conventional timed Up and Go test. The minimum detectable change in TUGmotor time was 3.53 seconds in stroke survivors. A TUGmotor cutoff time of 13.49 seconds was found to best discriminate the performance of stroke survivors from that of older adults without stroke.

Conclusions: The TUGmotor is a reliable, valid, and easy-to-administer clinical tool for assessing advanced functional mobility after a stroke.

Keywords: Rehabilitation; Stroke; Walking.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Chronic Disease
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Disability Evaluation*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Muscle Strength / physiology
  • Observer Variation
  • Physical Therapy Modalities / standards*
  • Postural Balance / physiology
  • Rehabilitation Centers
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Stroke Rehabilitation / methods*
  • Stroke Rehabilitation / standards*
  • Walking / physiology