State of the Art for Treatment of Vesicovaginal Fistula

Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Aug;18(8):60. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0708-5.

Abstract

Background: Vesico-vaginal fistulae (VVF) remain the most prevalent genitourinary fistula detrimentally impacting quality of life.

Purpose of the review: The purpose of this review is to examine relevant literature on management of VVF.

Recent findings: Obstructed labor is the leading cause of VVF in the developing world with most repairs performed via the transvaginal approach. Conversely, the predominate etiology in industrialized nations is iatrogenic injury with an increasing trend towards abdominal repair via a minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) approach. No studies have compared transvaginal repair to minimally invasive transabdominal approaches. Further, an increasing number of authors have developed algorithms to determine optimum surgical approaches and risk factors for persistent incontinence. As surgeons become more facile with laparoscopic and robotic skills, there is a growing trend for minimally invasive surgical management of VVF in developed countries, perhaps widening the disparity gap between developing nations where transvaginal approaches predominate with good success. Further studies are needed to compare transvaginal to minimally invasive transabdominal approaches.

Keywords: Incontinence; Minimally invasive; Robotic assisted laparoscopic; Transabdominal repair; Transvaginal repair; Vesicovaginal fistula.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Vesicovaginal Fistula / diagnosis
  • Vesicovaginal Fistula / etiology
  • Vesicovaginal Fistula / surgery*
  • Vesicovaginal Fistula / therapy