Cardioverting acute atrial fibrillation and the risk of thromboembolism: not all patients are created equal

Clin Med (Lond). 2017 Oct;17(5):419-423. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-5-419.

Abstract

Current guidelines support the well-established clinical practice that patients who present with atrial fibrillation (AF) of less than 48 hours duration should be considered for cardioversion, even in the absence of pre-existing anticoagulation. However, with increasing evidence that short runs of AF confer significant risk of stroke, on what evidence is this 48-hour rule based and is it time to adopt a new approach? We review existing evidence and suggest a novel approach to risk stratification in this setting. Overall, the risk of thromboembolism associated with acute cardioversion of patients with AF that is estimated to be of <48 hours duration is low. However, this risk varies widely depending on patient characteristics. From existing evidence, we show that using the CHA2DS2-VASc score may allow better selection of appropriate patients in order to prevent exposing specific patient groups to an unacceptably high risk of a potentially devastating complication.

Keywords: Anticoagulants; atrial fibrillation; cardioversion; electrical cardioversion; stroke; thromboembolism.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / epidemiology
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / therapy
  • Electric Countershock* / adverse effects
  • Electric Countershock* / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Risk
  • Thromboembolism* / drug therapy
  • Thromboembolism* / epidemiology
  • Thromboembolism* / etiology
  • Thromboembolism* / prevention & control

Substances

  • Anticoagulants