A comparison of two evisceration methods on hygienic quality in the pelvic area of sheep carcasses

Meat Sci. 2018 Mar:137:134-138. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.025. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

Abstract

The aim was to compare the effects of two evisceration methods under operational conditions, on the pelvic hygiene of sheep carcasses. Method 1: rectum sealed with plastic bag and pushed through the pelvic cavity. Method 2: rectum cut, placed back inside and pulled out from the carcass. The 18 largest Norwegian sheep abattoirs participated. Sampling areas were i) 400cm2 inside the pelvic cavity (n=623), ii) 100cm2 outside the circum-anal incision (n=622). There were pooled samples by swabbing the same area of five carcasses, representing totally 3115 carcasses. Mean E. coli results from Method 1: -1.61logCFU/cm2 inside and -0.25logCFU/cm2 for the outside area. Results from Method 2: -1.56logCFU/cm2 inside and -0.42logCFU/cm2 outside. There were no significant differences between the two methods. Both evisceration methods can produce carcasses that are of practically identical high hygienic quality.

Keywords: Bagging; E. coli; Lamb; Sheep; Slaughter.

MeSH terms

  • Abattoirs / standards*
  • Animals
  • Colony Count, Microbial
  • Escherichia coli / isolation & purification*
  • Feces
  • Food Contamination / prevention & control
  • Food Microbiology
  • Norway
  • Red Meat / microbiology*
  • Sheep / microbiology