Impact of different supply air and recirculating air filtration systems on stable climate, animal health, and performance of fattening pigs in a commercial pig farm

PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0194641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194641. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Biosecurity is defined as the implementation of measures that reduce the risk of disease agents being introduced and/or spread. For pig production, several of these measures are routinely implemented (e.g. cleaning, disinfection, segregation). However, air as a potential vector of pathogens has long been disregarded. Filters for incoming and recirculating air were installed into an already existing ventilation plant at a fattening piggery (3,840 pigs at maximum) in Saxony, Germany. Over a period of three consecutive fattening periods, we evaluated various parameters including air quality indices, environmental and operating parameters, and pig performance. Animal data regarding respiratory diseases, presence of antibodies against influenza A viruses, PRRSV, and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and lung health score at slaughter were recorded, additionally. There were no significant differences (p = 0.824) in total bacterial counts between barns with and without air filtration. Recirculating air filtration resulted in the lowest total dust concentration (0.12 mg/m3) and lung health was best in animals from the barn equipped with recirculating air filtration modules. However, there was no difference in animal performance. Antibodies against all above mentioned pathogens were detected but mostly animals were already antibody-positive at re-stocking. We demonstrated that supply air filtration as well as recirculating air filtration technique can easily be implemented in an already existing ventilation system and that recirculating air filtration resulted in enhanced lung health compared to supply air-filtered and non-filtered barns. A more prominent effect might have been obtained in a breeding facility because of the longer life span of sows and a higher biosecurity level with air filtration as an add-on measure.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adiposity* / physiology
  • Air Filters* / veterinary
  • Air Filters* / virology
  • Air Microbiology
  • Air Pollution*
  • Air Pollution, Indoor / analysis
  • Animal Husbandry / methods*
  • Animal Welfare / standards
  • Animals
  • Animals, Domestic
  • Commerce
  • Environment, Controlled
  • Farms
  • Filtration / methods
  • Filtration / veterinary
  • Swine / metabolism*
  • Swine / microbiology
  • Swine / virology
  • Ventilation / instrumentation
  • Ventilation / methods*

Grants and funding

This project was funded in part from a special purpose fund of the German federal government/Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture by the Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank (University of Leipzig grant number 741 120/1 and REVENTA® GmbH grant number 742 393/1). REVENTA® GmbH provided support in the form of salaries for author TR, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. We acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and Leipzig University within the program of Open Access Publishing (funding no. OAP-2018-127). The other funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.