Fluid shear stress impacts ovarian cancer cell viability, subcellular organization, and promotes genomic instability

PLoS One. 2018 Mar 22;13(3):e0194170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194170. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Ovarian cancer cells are exposed to physical stress in the peritoneal cavity during both tumor growth and dissemination. Ascites build-up in metastatic ovarian cancer further increases the exposure to fluid shear stress. Here, we used a murine, in vitro ovarian cancer progression model in parallel with immortalized human cells to investigate how ovarian cancer cells of increasing aggressiveness respond to [Formula: see text] of fluid-induced shear stress. This biophysical stimulus significantly reduced cell viability in all cells exposed, independent of disease stage. Fluid shear stress induced spheroid formation and altered cytoskeleton organization in more tumorigenic cell lines. While benign ovarian cells appeared to survive in higher numbers under the influence of fluid shear stress, they exhibited severe morphological changes and chromosomal instability. These results suggest that exposure of benign cells to low magnitude fluid shear stress can induce phenotypic changes that are associated with transformation and ovarian cancer progression. Moreover, exposure of tumorigenic cells to fluid shear stress enhanced anchorage-independent survival, suggesting a role in promoting invasion and metastasis.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Cell Survival
  • Cytoskeleton / metabolism*
  • Cytoskeleton / pathology
  • Female
  • Genomic Instability*
  • Humans
  • Mice
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / metabolism*
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / pathology
  • Shear Strength*
  • Stress, Mechanical*

Grants and funding

This work was funded in part by the National Science Foundation MultiSTEPS IGERT DGE Grant 0966125 to ARH, by seed funds from Center for Engineered Health (Virginia Tech Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science) (ICTAS) (to DC, RVD and EMS), the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project Grant 1006578 to EMS, and the Fralin Life Science Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University to EMS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.