Integrated information as a metric for group interaction

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205335. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Researchers in many disciplines have previously used a variety of mathematical techniques for analyzing group interactions. Here we use a new metric for this purpose, called "integrated information" or "phi." Phi was originally developed by neuroscientists as a measure of consciousness in brains, but it captures, in a single mathematical quantity, two properties that are important in many other kinds of groups as well: differentiated information and integration. Here we apply this metric to the activity of three types of groups that involve people and computers. First, we find that 4-person work groups with higher measured phi perform a wide range of tasks more effectively, as measured by their collective intelligence. Next, we find that groups of Wikipedia editors with higher measured phi create higher quality articles. Last, we find that the measured phi of the collection of people and computers communicating on the Internet increased over a recent six-year period. Together, these results suggest that integrated information can be a useful way of characterizing a certain kind of interactional complexity that, at least sometimes, predicts group performance. In this sense, phi can be viewed as a potential metric of effective group collaboration.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Consciousness / physiology*
  • Entropy
  • Humans
  • Intelligence Tests
  • Intelligence*
  • Internet
  • Mathematical Concepts*
  • Neurosciences / statistics & numerical data*

Grants and funding

This work was supported by grants to TWM from the National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov; grant numbers IIS-0963285, ACI-1322254, and IIS-0963451), the U. S. Army Research Office (http://www.arl.army.mil/; grant numbers 56692-MA, 64079-NS, W911NF-15-1-0577, and W911NF-13-1-0422) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (www.cisco.com), through their sponsorship of the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.