Skin lesion monitoring at slaughter on heavy pigs (170 kg): Welfare indicators and ham defects

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0207115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207115. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

In order to evaluate at the slaughterhouse external carcass lesions on heavy pigs (170 kg) as potential welfare indicators, and the prevalence of ham defects determining ham exclusion from Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) markets, 732 pig batches from northern Italy were monitored during a 12-month period, and then processed analysing the effect of slaughter season, overnight lairage, and production type. On the slaughter line, skin scratches were separately scored in the posterior region (defined as the area including the hind legs and the tail) and the anterior one (as the remaining area), while the whole carcass was examined for external hematomas. Chronic ear and tail lesions referable to the rearing phase, and bursitis were recorded as retrospective welfare indicators. The annual median prevalence of carcasses per batch with severe anterior scratches was 64% while 46.4% had severe posterior scratches. The highest autumn score for both skin scratches (P < 0.001) and traumatic ham defects (P = 0.005) is reflected in the positive correlation between severe posterior scratches and ham hematomas (r2 = 0.27; P < 0.001). Overnight lairage batches resulted in higher prevalence for scratches, while among ham defects only veining increased. Among binary records, only ear lesions were frequently recorded (annual median = 10%). A comparison analysis between pigs in and out of PDO circuit was performed to evaluate the variation related to the different genetics, showing differences for ear and tail lesions and for almost all the considered ham defects. The present study confirms that skin lesions represent a problem also for heavy pigs and that overnight lairage and season can affect their prevalence, with the associated possibility to give ham defects. Ear lesions are suitable to be used as retrospective welfare indicator, while tail lesions usage is nowadays limited by the extensive use of tail docking.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Abattoirs*
  • Animal Welfare*
  • Animals
  • Body Weight
  • Ear / injuries
  • Female
  • Food Quality*
  • Italy
  • Male
  • Meat Products
  • Prevalence
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Seasons
  • Skin / injuries*
  • Sus scrofa / injuries*
  • Swine
  • Tail / injuries
  • Time Factors
  • Wounds and Injuries / epidemiology
  • Wounds and Injuries / veterinary*

Grants and funding

This research “Skin lesion monitoring at slaughter on heavy pigs (170 kg): welfare indicators and ham defects” was partially financed by a university project (PRAT 2105, code: CPDA158107; title:use of animal based measures taken at the slaughterhouse as indicators of welfare at the farm: a retrospective approach; URL: http://www.unipd.it/sites/unipd.it/files/Elenco_PRAtFinanziati_CdA-25-01-16.pdf) and by the Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health of the Universityof Padova. The authors want to thanks the abattoir Società Cooperativa Agricola OPAS (OrganizzazioneProdotto Allevatori Suini, Carpi, Modena, Italy) and Merial Italia S.p.A. for co-funding the phase ofdata collection at the slaughterhouse. The funders provided support in the form of salaries for authors (MV, VP), but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the “authors contributions” section. One of the authors has a commercial affiliation to Società Cooperativa Agricola OPAS (Organizzazione Prodotto Allevatori Suini, Carpi, Modena, Italy) and received financial support only in the form of salaries as an employee of this company. The abattoir Società Cooperativa Agricola OPAS didn’t play any additional roles than what has been already stated.