Not every sperm counts: Male fertility in solitary bees, Osmia cornuta

PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214597. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Reproductive strategies can act as strong selective forces on reproductive traits of male insects, resulting in species-specific variation in sperm quantity and viability. For solitary bees, basic measures of sperm quantity and viability are scarce. Here we evaluated for the first time quantity and viability of sperm in male Osmia cornuta solitary bees at different times after emergence, and how they were affected by male body mass and environmental condition (laboratory or semi-field arena). Sperm viability immediately after adult emergence showed no significant difference compared to four day old individuals, suggesting that O. cornuta males are capable of mating immediately post emergence. However, sperm counts were significantly higher in four day old individuals from the semi-field arena when compared to newly emerged males. This might reflect a final phase of sperm maturation. Regardless of individual male age and body mass differences, O. cornuta males produced on average ~175'000 spermatozoa that were ~65% viable, which are both significantly lower compared to eusocial honeybees and bumblebees. Moreover, sperm quantity, but not viability, was positively correlated with male body mass four days after emergence, while no such relationship was detected immediately after emergence. Even though individuals maintained in semi-field conditions exhibited a significantly greater loss of body mass, experimental arena had no significant effect on male survival, sperm quality or total living sperm produced. This suggests that the proposed laboratory design provides a cost-efficient and simple experimental approach to assess sperm traits in solitary bees. In conclusion, our data suggest a reduced investment in both sperm quantity and quality by male O. cornuta, which appears to be adaptive in light of the life history of this solitary bee.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bees / cytology*
  • Bees / growth & development
  • Bees / physiology*
  • Body Size
  • Fertility
  • Male
  • Sperm Count*
  • Tissue Survival

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.6vc85tp

Grants and funding

Financial support was provided by the Ökotoxzentrum (EAWAG) to V.S. and P.N., by the Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU) to L.S., G.R.W. and P.N., Agroscope to V.S., the Vinetum Foundation to P.N., the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) project 31003A_169751 to G.R.W., the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research Pollinator Health Fund grant 549003 to G.R.W., the Chiang Mai University Fund to P.N., as well as the ASEM-DUO Fellowship Program to L.S. and J.M. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.