Selective advantages favour high genomic AT-contents in intracellular elements

PLoS Genet. 2019 Apr 29;15(4):e1007778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007778. eCollection 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Extrachromosomal genetic elements such as bacterial endosymbionts and plasmids generally exhibit AT-contents that are increased relative to their hosts' DNA. The AT-bias of endosymbiotic genomes is commonly explained by neutral evolutionary processes such as a mutational bias towards increased A+T. Here we show experimentally that an increased AT-content of host-dependent elements can be selectively favoured. Manipulating the nucleotide composition of bacterial cells by introducing A+T-rich or G+C-rich plasmids, we demonstrate that cells containing GC-rich plasmids are less fit than cells containing AT-rich plasmids. Moreover, the cost of GC-rich elements could be compensated by providing precursors of G+C, but not of A+T, thus linking the observed fitness effects to the cytoplasmic availability of nucleotides. Accordingly, introducing AT-rich and GC-rich plasmids into other bacterial species with different genomic GC-contents revealed that the costs of G+C-rich plasmids decreased with an increasing GC-content of their host's genomic DNA. Taken together, our work identifies selection as a strong evolutionary force that drives the genomes of intracellular genetic elements toward higher A+T contents.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Base Composition*
  • Extrachromosomal Inheritance
  • Gene Dosage
  • Genetic Structures*
  • Genome, Bacterial*
  • Genomics* / methods
  • Plasmids
  • Selection, Genetic

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.p933f2c

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the International Max-Planck Research School "Exploration of Ecological Interactions with Molecular and Chemical Techniques" (AKD, http://imprs.ice.mpg.de/ext/index.php?id=home), the Volkswagen Foundation (CK, I/85 290, https://www.volkswagenstiftung.de/en), the German Research Foundation (CK: DFG SFB 944/ P19; MK: DFG KA2846/2-2, http://www.dfg.de/en/index.jsp), and the Max-Planck Society (AKD, HM, MK, CK, https://www.mpg.de/en). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.