Background: The prevalence of a bovine aortic arch configuration is higher in patients treated for thoracic aortic aneurysms and type B dissection; its prevalence in aortic isthmic trauma has not been described.
Methods: A case control study was performed comparing consecutive patients treated at our institution for acute isthmic aortic transection after blunt trauma between 2002 and 2019 and a control group of consecutive sex-matched individuals undergoing imaging for nonaortic disease. Imaging and clinical findings were reviewed. Subjects were divided into bovine and nonbovine groups and prevalence was compared. The length of the aortic segment between the left subclavian artery (LSA) and the next proximal great vessel was measured in the control population and a comparison was performed between bovine and nonbovine aortic arch subjects.
Results: Thirty-three consecutive (30 male) patients were reviewed, 66 individuals (60 male) were included in the control group. A higher incidence of bovine arch in trauma patients was found: 57.6% vs. 34.8% (P = 0.007). The median (range, mm) and mean (SD) distance between the bovine trunk and the LSA were 13 mm (2-27) and 12.4 mm (5.9), respectively, compared with 5 mm (1-27) and 7.8 mm (6.1) between the left common carotid and LSA in nonbovine aortic arches (P < 0.005).
Conclusion: A higher incidence of bovine arch in patients reaching out for surgical treatment for traumatic isthmic aortic transection was found in our population. Clinical interpretation of this finding can lead to several alternatives. Confirmation with larger series and data on prevalence of this anatomic variation in nonsurvivors is needed to provide a better understanding of this finding.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.