Actinobacterial Coproheme Decarboxylases Use Histidine as a Distal Base to Promote Compound I Formation

ACS Catal. 2020 May 15;10(10):5405-5418. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00411. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

Abstract

Coproheme decarboxylases (ChdCs) catalyze the final step in heme b biosynthesis of monoderm and some diderm bacteria. In this reaction, coproheme is converted to heme b via monovinyl monopropionate deuteroheme (MMD) in two consecutive decarboxylation steps. In Firmicutes decarboxylation of propionates 2 and 4 of coproheme depend on hydrogen peroxide and the presence of a catalytic tyrosine. Here we demonstrate that ChdCs from Actinobacteria are unique in using a histidine (H118 in ChdC from Corynebacterium diphtheriae, CdChdC) as a distal base in addition to the redox-active tyrosine (Y135). We present the X-ray crystal structures of coproheme-CdChdC and MMD-CdChdC, which clearly show (i) differences in the active site architecture between Firmicutes and Actinobacteria and (ii) rotation of the redox-active reaction intermediate (MMD) after formation of the vinyl group at position 2. Distal H118 is shown to catalyze the heterolytic cleavage of hydrogen peroxide (k app = (4.90 ± 1.25) × 104 M-1 s-1). The resulting Compound I is rapidly converted to a catalytically active Compound I* (oxoiron(IV) Y135) that initiates the radical decarboxylation reactions. As a consequence of the more efficient Compound I formation, actinobacterial ChdCs exhibit a higher catalytic efficiency in comparison to representatives from Firmicutes. On the basis of the kinetic data of wild-type CdChdC and the variants H118A, Y135A, and H118A/Y135A together with high-resolution crystal structures and molecular dynamics simulations, we present a molecular mechanism for the hydrogen peroxide dependent conversion of coproheme via MMD to heme b and discuss differences between ChdCs from Actinobacteria and Firmicutes.