Industrial environmental efficiency and its influencing factors in China: analysis based on the Super-SBM model and spatial panel data

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(35):44267-44278. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10235-y. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

Abstract

The industry sector is not only an important driving force for economic growth but also the largest sector of resource consumption and pollution emission. In this study, we first constructed a super-slack-based measure (Super-SBM) model including the resource consumption and undesirable outputs, and estimated the industrial environmental efficiency (IEE) in China from 2007 to 2016. Afterwards, based on the spatial autocorrelation test and the spatial Durbin model, the spatio-temporal evolution and the influencing factors of IEE were analyzed. The empirical results are obtained as follows: the average IEE from 2007 to 2016 was 0.5176. IEE in the east of China was the highest, whereas it was the lowest in the west. The spatial autocorrelation test showed that the regions with similar levels of IEE in China had significant spatial agglomeration, whereas the local spatial distribution of IEE was unbalanced. The high-high IEE agglomeration areas were located in Liaoning, Jilin, and Inner Mongolia. The low-low IEE agglomeration areas were concentrated in Gansu, Ningxia, and Sichuan. Finally, according to the spatial Durbin panel model and spillover effect decomposition, GDP, FDI, human capital, environmental governance investment, research and development investment, and urbanization have a positive impact on IEE. The industrial and energy consumption structures have a negative impact on IEE. Therefore, the central government should focus on balancing IEE of different provinces and regions, increasing investment in industrial pollution treatment, and encouraging FDI to improve IEE.

Keywords: China’s industrial environmental efficiency; Spatial Durbin model; Spatio-temporal evolution; Super-SBM model.

MeSH terms

  • China
  • Conservation of Natural Resources*
  • Economic Development
  • Efficiency
  • Environmental Policy*
  • Humans
  • Industry