Willingness to Pay for Select Tick-Borne Disease Prevention Measures in Endemic Areas

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022 Jan-Feb;28(1):E37-E42. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001295.

Abstract

Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) are increasing despite prevention recommendations. We explored whether cost is a barrier to prevention use in Connecticut and Maryland, using a cross-sectional survey. Respondents were queried regarding their willingness to pay for chemical, natural, and rodent-targeted yard pesticide treatments and permethrin-treated clothing. We evaluated associations between demographics, TBD knowledge and attitudes, and willingness to pay for prevention methods. Most respondents would pay for yard treatments (85%); 95% preferring natural pesticide, and 82% would pay for permethrin-treated clothing. Most did not want to pay more than $99 for any of the yard treatments. Having a household income of $100 000 was associated with willingness to pay $100 or more for chemical, natural, or rodent-targeted treatments and $25 or more for permethrin self-treated and pretreated clothing. Yard treatments, especially natural pesticides, were acceptable for TBD prevention; however, current pricing may be cost-prohibitive. Permethrin-treated clothing may be an affordable and acceptable prevention method.

MeSH terms

  • Connecticut
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Humans
  • Maryland
  • Permethrin
  • Tick-Borne Diseases* / prevention & control

Substances

  • Permethrin