Formal requirements for genotoxicity testing of drug candidates to support clinical entry have been in place since the issue of initial regulatory guidance over 25 years ago and subsequent update a decade ago. An evaluation of such testing, supporting first clinical entry of 108 small molecule drug candidates over the last decade, showed that the most common approach (75 % of tested compounds) was for a Good Laboratory Practice test battery in the form of 2 in vitro (a bacterial reverse mutation and a mammalian cell) assays and one in vivo assay. The majority of other tested compounds involved in vitro testing only in bacterial reverse mutation and mammalian cell assays. Testing using a bacterial reverse mutation assay and an in vivo assessment of genotoxicity with 2 different tissues was limited to 2 occasions. For in vitro mammalian cell testing, the chromosome aberration test was most commonly used (70 % occasions), followed by a micronucleus test (16 % occasions) or a mouse lymphoma assay (14 % occasions). For in vivo evaluation, the most common test was a rodent bone marrow micronucleus test (87 % occasions). A positive in vitro mammalian cell assay result was seen on 13 % occasions but was not confirmed with further in vivo testing and the drug candidates were taken into the clinic. In conclusion, the present evaluation showed that the current test battery paradigm for genotoxicity testing has an integral part in supporting clinical entry to confirm candidate drugs taken into the clinic are unlikely to have genotoxic activity.
Keywords: Bacterial reverse mutation assay; Comet assay; Genotoxicity; Micronucleus test; Mouse lymphoma assay.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.