Predictive power of early-warning scores used in hospital emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Emergencias. 2021 Oct;33(5):374-381.
[Article in English, Spanish]

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the predictive power of scores used in hospital emergency departments (EDs) to give early warning of risk for mortality and hospital ward or intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

Material and methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Observational studies and clinical trials published between January 1, 1950, and June 12, 2020 that used early-warning scores in hospital EDs were included. The main outcomes were mortality (at 24, 48, and more than 72 hours), hospital admission, and ICU admission.

Results: Nine studies entered into the systematic review; 4 of them, with 165 580 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The studies were heterogeneous with respect to the scores used. The one used most often was the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). The meta-analysis of studies using the NEWS scale showed that it had good predictive power for mortality: the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.88 (95%, CI, 0.87-0.89; P .001, I2 = 0%) at 24 hours and 0.86 (0.84-0.88; P .001; I2 = 49.3%) at 48 hours. The AUC for inhospital mortality was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74-0.80; P .001; I2 = 96.2%). The NEWS score had adequate power for predicting risk of hospital ward and ICU admission.

Conclusion: Early warning scores used in hospital EDs are able to predict risk of early and in-hospital mortality.

Objetivo: Evaluar, en términos de ingreso hospitalario o en unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) y muerte, la capacidad predictiva de las escalas de alerta temprana en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH).

Metodo: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis. Se consultaron las bases de datos Medline, Embase, Web of Science y Cochrane Library. Se incluyeron estudios observacionales y ensayos clínicos publicados entre e 1 de enero de 1950 y 12 de junio de 2020 en los que se empleara una escala de alerta temprana en los SUH. Las variables de resultados principales fueron mortalidad (24 horas, 48 horas y más de 72 horas) e ingreso hospitalario y en UCI.

Resultados: Se seleccionaron 9 estudios en la revisión sistemática, 4 se incluyeron en el metanálisis (165.580 pacientes). Hubo heterogeneidad en las escalas empleadas, siendo la escala NEWS la más utilizada. El uso de la escala NEWS mostró una buena capacidad predictiva para la mortalidad a las 24 horas [AUROC 0,88 (IC 95% 0,87-0,89); p 0,001; I2 = 0%], a las 48 horas [AUROC 0,86 (IC 95% 0,84-0,88); p 0,001; I2 = 49,3%] e intrahospitalaria [AUROC: 0,77 (IC 95% 0,74-0,80); p 0,001; I2 = 96,2%]. Para el ingreso hospitalario y en UCI, NEWS mostró una capacidad predictiva adecuada.

Conclusiones: El uso de las escalas de alerta temprana en los SUH muestra una capacidad predictiva buena en términos de mortalidad temprana e intrahospitalaria.

Keywords: Diagnostic tests.; Early-warning scores.; Emergency department, hospital.; Escalas de alerta temprana.; Meta-analysis.; Metanálisis.; Morbidity.; Morbilidad.; Mortalidad.; Mortality.; Prueba diagnóstica.; Servicios de urgencias hospitalarios..

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Emergency Service, Hospital*
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units*
  • ROC Curve