Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: why not?

Curr Opin Neurol. 2022 Feb 1;35(1):10-17. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001004.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The aim of this study was to summarize available evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) using recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with specific comorbidities and potential contraindications to systemic reperfusion therapy. Recent advances in IVT implementation in wake-up stroke and in extended time window using advanced neuroimaging will also be highlighted.

Recent findings: Despite theoretical concerns of a higher bleeding risk with IVT, there are no data showing increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) in patients with stroke mimics, including seizures, increasing age and dual antiplatelet pretreatment. In addition, recent randomized evidence allows us to expand the time window of IVT for AIS using advanced neuroimaging both in wake-up stroke patients and in patients presenting within 4.5-9 h from symptom onset fulfilling certain neuroimaging criteria (based on DWI/FLAIR mismatch or perfusion mismatch).

Summary: IVT is a highly effective systemic reperfusion therapy that counts 25 years of everyday clinical experience but still presents several challenges in its application. Appropriate patient selection and adherence to rt-PA protocol is paramount in terms of safety. The effort to simplify the indications, expand the therapeutic time window and eliminate specific initial contraindications is continuously evolving.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Brain Ischemia* / drug therapy
  • Fibrinolytic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Ischemic Stroke* / drug therapy
  • Thrombolytic Therapy*
  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Fibrinolytic Agents
  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator