Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Abstract
Background:
Patients with minor head injury [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 13–15] have a small but important risk of intracranial injury (ICI) that requires early identification and neurosurgical treatment. Diagnostic assessment can use either a clinical decision rule or unstructured assessment of individual clinical features to identify those who are at risk of ICI and in need of computerised tomography (CT) scanning and/or hospital admission. Selective use of CT investigations helps minimise unnecessary radiation exposure and resource use, but can lead to missed opportunities to provide early treatment for ICI.
Objectives:
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of decision rules, individual clinical characteristics, skull radiography and biomarkers, and the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diagnostic management strategies for minor head injury (MHI).
Data sources:
Several electronic databases [including MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE and The Cochrane Library] were searched from inception to April 2009 (updated searches to March 2010 were conducted on the MEDLINE databases only). Searches were supplemented by hand-searching relevant articles (including citation searching) and contacting experts in the field. For each of the systematic reviews the following studies were included (1) cohort studies of patients with MHI in which a clinical decision rule or individual clinical characteristics (including biomarkers and skull radiography) were compared with a reference standard test for ICI or need for neurosurgical intervention and (2) controlled trials comparing alternative management strategies for MHI.
Review methods:
Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool (for the assessment of diagnostic accuracy) or criteria recommended by the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group (for the assessment of management practices). Where sufficient data existed, a meta-analysis was undertaken to generate pooled estimates of diagnostic parameters. A decision-analysis model was developed using Simul8 2008 Professional software (Simul8 Corporation, Boston, MA, USA) to estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) accrued by management strategies for MHI. The model took a lifetime horizon and NHS perspective. Estimates of the benefits of early treatment, harm of radiation exposure and long-term costs were obtained through literature reviews. Initial analysis was deterministic, but probabilistic sensitivity analysis was also performed. Secondary analyses were undertaken to explore the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic strategies and to determine the cost-effectiveness of scenarios involving hospital admission.
Results:
The literature searches identified 8003 citations. Of these, 93 full-text papers were included for the assessment of diagnostic accuracy and one for the assessment of management practices. The quality of studies and reporting was generally poor. The Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) was the most widely validated adult rule, with sensitivity of 99–100% and 80–100% for neurosurgical and any ICI, respectively (high- or medium-risk criteria), and specificity of 39–51%. Rules for children had high sensitivity and acceptable specificity in derivation cohorts, but limited validation. Depressed, basal or radiological skull fracture and post-traumatic seizure (PTS) [positive likelihood ratio (PLR) > 10]; focal neurological deficit, persistent vomiting, decrease in GCS and previous neurosurgery (PLR 5–10); and fall from a height, coagulopathy, chronic alcohol use, age > 60 years, pedestrian motor vehicle accident (MVA), any seizure, undefined vomiting, amnesia, GCS < 14 and GCS < 15 (PLR 2–5) increased the likelihood of ICI in adults. Depressed or basal skull fracture and focal neurological deficit (PLR > 10), coagulopathy, PTS and previous neurosurgery (PLR 5–10), visual symptoms, bicycle and pedestrian MVA, any seizure, loss of consciousness, vomiting, severe or persistent headache, amnesia, GCS < 14, GCS < 15, intoxication and radiological skull fracture (PLR 2–5) increased the likelihood of ICI in children. S100 calcium-binding protein B had pooled sensitivity of 96.8% [95% highest-density region (HDR) 93.8% to 98.6%] and specificity of 42.5% (95% HDR 31.0% to 54.2%). The only controlled trial showed that early CT and discharge is cheaper and at least as effective as hospital admission. Economic analysis showed that selective CT use dominated ‘CT all’ and ‘discharge all’ strategies. The optimal strategies were the CCHR (adults) and the CHALICE (Children's Head injury Algorithm for the prediction of Important Clinical Events) or NEXUS II (National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study II) rule (children). The sensitivity and specificity of the CCHR (99% and 47%, respectively) represented an appropriate trade-off of these parameters. Hospital admission dominated discharge home for patients with non-neurosurgical injury, but cost £39 M per QALY for clinically normal patients with a normal CT.
Conclusions:
The CCHR is widely validated and cost-effective for adults. Decision rules for children appear cost-effective, but need further validation. Hospital admission is cost-effective for patients with abnormal, but not normal, CT. The main research priorities are to (1) validate decision rules for children; (2) determine the prognosis and treatment benefit for non-neurosurgical injuries; (3) evaluate the use of S100B alongside a validated decision rule; (4) evaluate the diagnosis and outcomes of anticoagulated patients with MHI; and (5) evaluate the implementation of guidelines, clinical decision rules and diagnostic strategies. Formal expected value of sample information analysis would be recommended to appraise the cost-effectiveness of future studies.
Funding:
The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Contents
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- Glossary
- List of abbreviations
- Executive summary
- 1. Background
- 2. Research questions
- 3. Assessment of diagnostic accuracy
- 4. Review of studies evaluating diagnostic management strategies
- 5. Assessment of cost-effectiveness evidence
- 6. Survey of current NHS practice
- 7. Discussion
- 8. Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Health Technology Assessment programme
- Appendix 1 Diagnostic accuracy and management strategies for minor head injury review: literature search strategies – a MEDLINE example
- Appendix 2 The modified QUADAS tool for the methodological assessment of diagnostic studies
- Appendix 3 Diagnostic accuracy review – PRISMA (adapted) flow chart
- Appendix 4 Diagnostic accuracy review – table of excluded studies with rationale
- Appendix 5 Individual clinical characteristics in adults – data for meta-analysis
- Appendix 6 Individual clinical characteristics in children and infants – data for meta-analysis
- Appendix 7 Management practices review – PRISMA (adapted) flow chart
- Appendix 8 Management practices review – table of excluded studies with rationale
- Appendix 9 Cost-effectiveness review: literature search strategies – a MEDLINE example
- Appendix 10 Cost-effectiveness review – PRISMA (adapted) flow chart
- Appendix 11 Cost-effectiveness review – table of excluded studies with rationale
- Appendix 12 Questionnaire survey (adults) sent to lead clinician
- Appendix 13 Protocol
Suggested citation:
Pandor A, Goodacre S, Harnan S, Holmes M, Pickering A, Fitzgerald P, et al. Diagnostic management strategies for adults and children with minor head injury: a systematic review and an economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2011;15(27).
Declared competing interests of authors: none
The research reported in this issue of the journal was commissioned by the HTA programme as project number 07/37/08. The contractual start date was in February 2009. The draft report began editorial review in June 2010 and was accepted for publication in October 2010. As the funder, by devising a commissioning brief, the HTA programme specified the research question and study design. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the referees for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.
The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the HTA programme or the Department of Health.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- The cost-effectiveness of diagnostic management strategies for adults with minor head injury.[Injury. 2012]The cost-effectiveness of diagnostic management strategies for adults with minor head injury.Holmes MW, Goodacre S, Stevenson MD, Pandor A, Pickering A. Injury. 2012 Sep; 43(9):1423-31. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
- Review Systematic review and modelling of the cost-effectiveness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging compared with current existing testing pathways in ischaemic cardiomyopathy.[Health Technol Assess. 2014]Review Systematic review and modelling of the cost-effectiveness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging compared with current existing testing pathways in ischaemic cardiomyopathy.Campbell F, Thokala P, Uttley LC, Sutton A, Sutton AJ, Al-Mohammad A, Thomas SM. Health Technol Assess. 2014 Sep; 18(59):1-120.
- Review Will Neuroimaging Reveal a Severe Intracranial Injury in This Adult With Minor Head Trauma?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review.[JAMA. 2015]Review Will Neuroimaging Reveal a Severe Intracranial Injury in This Adult With Minor Head Trauma?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review.Easter JS, Haukoos JS, Meehan WP, Novack V, Edlow JA. JAMA. 2015 Dec 22-29; 314(24):2672-81.
- Review Non-invasive diagnostic assessment tools for the detection of liver fibrosis in patients with suspected alcohol-related liver disease: a systematic review and economic evaluation.[Health Technol Assess. 2012]Review Non-invasive diagnostic assessment tools for the detection of liver fibrosis in patients with suspected alcohol-related liver disease: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Stevenson M, Lloyd-Jones M, Morgan MY, Wong R. Health Technol Assess. 2012; 16(4):1-174.
- Review Elucigene FH20 and LIPOchip for the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review and economic evaluation.[Health Technol Assess. 2012]Review Elucigene FH20 and LIPOchip for the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Sharma P, Boyers D, Boachie C, Stewart F, Miedzybrodzka Z, Simpson W, Kilonzo M, McNamee P, Mowatt G. Health Technol Assess. 2012; 16(17):1-266.
- Diagnostic Management Strategies for Adults and Children with Minor Head Injury:...Diagnostic Management Strategies for Adults and Children with Minor Head Injury: A Systematic Review and an Economic Evaluation
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...