Prevention of STIs, HIV and viral hepatitis |
---|
Harm reduction (NSPs, OAMT and naloxone for overdose management) |
---|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| All individuals from key populations who inject drugs should have access to sterile injecting equipment through NSPs (strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence) (3, 83, 167). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
| It is suggested that NSPs also provide low dead-space syringes (LDSSs), along with information about their preventive advantage over conventional syringes (this recommendation is conditional on local acceptability and resource availability) (168). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
|
All people from key populations who are dependent on opioids should be offered OAMT5 in keeping with WHO guidance (strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence) (3, 83, 169), including those in prison and other closed settings (170).
Important considerations related to OAMT, including recommended doses, use in pregnancy and drug interactions are included in:
Guidelines for the psychosocially assisted pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence
Guidelines for the identification and management of substance use and substance use disorders in pregnancy
|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| People likely to witness an opioid overdose should have access to naloxone and be instructed in its use for emergency management of suspected opioid overdose (strong recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) (27). |
| More details of community distribution of naloxone for overdose management can be found in the WHO guideline Community management of opioid overdose. |
Condoms and lubricant |
---|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| The correct and consistent use of insertive and receptive condoms with adequate supply of condom compatible lubricants is recommended to prevent sexual transmission of HIV, viral hepatitis and STIs through anal or vaginal sex6
(strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (3). |
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV |
---|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| Oral PrEP (containing tenofovir disproxyl fumarate) should be offered as an additional prevention choice for people at substantial risk of HIV infection as part of combination HIV prevention approaches (strong recommendation, high certainty of evidence) (171). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
| The dapivirine vaginal ring may be offered as an additional prevention choice for cisgender women at substantial risk of HIV infection as part of combination prevention approaches (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (171). |
★
New GRADE recommendation
| Long-acting injectable cabotegravir may be offered as an additional prevention choice for people at substantial risk of HIV infection, as part of combination prevention approaches (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (172). |
|
For detailed guidance on PrEP please see Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring: recommendations for a public health approach.
For implementation guidance, please see Differentiated and simplified pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: Update to WHO implementation guidance.
|
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV and STIs |
---|
Existing guidance statement
| PEP should be available to all eligible people from key populations on a voluntary basis after possible exposure to HIV (3). |
Existing guidance statement
| For women who have been raped, a package of PEP, emergency contraception and presumptive treatment of STIs is recommended (173). |
|
For detailed guidance on HIV PEP regimens, please see Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring: recommendations for a public health approach.
For detailed guidance on PEP for adults who have been sexually abused, please see WHO guidelines Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women.
For detailed guidance on PEP for children and adolescents who have been sexually abused, please see WHO guidelines Responding to children and adolescents who have been sexually abused.
|
Prevention of vertical transmission of HIV, syphilis and HBV |
---|
Existing GRADE recommendation (adapted)
7
|
HIV, syphilis and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)* tests should be offered at least once and as early as possible in pregnancy, ideally at the first antenatal care (ANC) visit (syphilis: strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence; HBsAg*: strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence) (174, 175).
* Particularly in settings with a ≥2% HBsAg seroprevalence in the general population.
Recommended time points for HIV retesting for pregnant and postpartum key populations: early in pregnancy (first ANC visit); late in pregnancy (third trimester ANC visit); one additional postpartum retest (14 weeks, six months or nine months postpartum) (175).
Please see also STI testing below; chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening is recommended for all key populations, including those who are pregnant.
|
Existing guidance statement
| Dual HIV/syphilis rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) can be the first test in HIV testing strategies and algorithms in ANC (176). HBsAG testing should be considered in addition when dual testing is performed. |
Existing good practice statement (adapted)
8
| ART should be initiated urgently among all pregnant and breast and chest feeding people living with HIV, even if they are identified late in pregnancy or postpartum, because the most effective way to prevent HIV vertical transmission is to reduce maternal viral load (171). |
Existing GRADE recommendation (adapted)
9
| For early syphilis in pregnancy, the WHO STI guideline suggests using benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million units once intramuscularly over procaine penicillin 1.2 million units intramuscularly once daily for 10
days (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) (177). |
Existing GRADE recommendation (adapted)
10
| WHO recommends that those who test positive for HBV infection (HBsAg positive) with an HBV DNA ≥ 5.3 log10 IU/mL (≥ 200,000 IU/mL) during pregnancy receive tenofovir prophylaxis from the 28th week of pregnancy until at least birth, to prevent vertical transmission of HBV. This is in addition to three-dose hepatitis B vaccination in all infants, including timely birth dose (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (178). |
Existing GRADE recommendation (adapted)
11
|
WHO recommends that in settings in which antenatal HBV DNA testing is not available, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) testing can be used as an alternative to HBV DNA testing to determine eligibility for tenofovir prophylaxis to prevent vertical transmission of HBV2 (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (178).
Please see also: WHO technical brief: preventing HIV during pregnancy and breastfeeding in the context of PrEP.
|
Hepatitis B vaccination |
---|
Existing WHO position
|
WHO recommends hepatitis B vaccination of persons at high risk of HBV infection.12
Please find further details in WHO position paper: Hepatitis B vaccines: – July 2017
|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| It is suggested to offer people who inject drugs the rapid hepatitis B vaccination regimen13
(conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) (168). |
Addressing chemsex |
---|
★
New good practice statement
|
Addressing chemsex*, especially for key populations and their sexual partners, requires a comprehensive, non-judgemental and person-centred approach. This can include integrated sexual and reproductive health, mental health, access to sterile needles and syringes and OAMT services, with linkages to other evidence-based prevention, diagnostic and treatment interventions.
*Chemsex, for the purpose of these guidelines, is defined as when individuals engage in sexual activity, while taking primarily stimulant drugs, typically involving multiple participants and over a prolonged period.
Further details on evidence, decision-making, implementations, considerations and research gaps related to this new recommendation can be found in Chapter 9.
|
Diagnosis |
---|
HIV testing services |
---|
Existing guidance statement
| In high and low HIV-burden settings, HIV testing should be offered to all key populations and their partners in all services as an efficient and effective way to identify people with HIV (175). |
Existing guidance statement
|
It is recommended to offer retesting at least annually to all people from key populations. Depending on individual risk behaviours, more frequent voluntary retesting can be offered (175).
Mathematical modelling among key populations in Viet Nam shows that retesting for key populations is cost effective. Bi-annual testing for key populations may be considered in similar settings, and should prioritize those at higher risk (179).
|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| Community-based HIV testing services for key populations linked to prevention, treatment and care services are recommended, in addition to routine, facility-based HIV testing services in all settings (strong
recommendation, low certainty of evidence) (175). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
| Lay providers who are trained can, using rapid diagnostic tests, independently conduct safe and effective HIV testing services (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (175). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
|
HIV self-testing should be offered as an approach to HIV testing services (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (175).
Please note that self-testing means an individual performing a test on themselves in private or under observation of a professional if they so desire. It should be voluntary and cannot be forced or coerced by anyone. Importantly, people who have self-tested should not be forced to disclose the results of that test to anyone, and should only do so on a voluntary basis.
|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| Social network-based approaches can be offered as an approach to HIV testing key populations as part of a comprehensive package of care and prevention (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) (175). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
|
Provider-assisted referral should be offered for all people with HIV as part of a voluntary comprehensive package of testing and care (including key populations) (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (175).
Please note that particularly for sex workers, the risks associated with disclosing an HIV diagnosis to either clients or regular partners must be carefully considered and should always be voluntary. People who are experiencing intimate partner or other violence need assessment, support, documentation, treatment of any injuries and referral to appropriate services (162).
|
Existing guidance statement
|
Dual HIV/syphilis RDTs may be considered for use among key populations and can increase access to both HIV and syphilis testing services (181).
Further testing to confirm syphilis diagnosis or offer of treatment depends on local epidemiology, past treatment history, available resources and confirmatory testing capacity, and national protocols.
Mathematical modelling among key populations in Viet Nam shows that using dual HIV/syphilis RDT is cost-saving compared to separate HIV and syphilis tests at current coverage (179).
|
| For detailed guidance on HIV testing, please see Consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services. |
STI testing |
---|
Existing guidance statement
| Screening and diagnosing STIs for key populations is a crucial part of a comprehensive response to HIV and STIs (3). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
| Offering periodic testing for asymptomatic urethral and rectal N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis infections using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) is suggested over not offering such testing for men who have sex with men and trans and gender diverse people (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence) (79). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
| Offering periodic serological testing for asymptomatic syphilis infection to men who have sex with men and trans and gender diverse people is strongly recommended over not offering such screening (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (79). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
|
WHO suggests offering periodic screening for asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections* to sex workers (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence) (84).
*Chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis
|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| Self-collection of samples for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis should be made available as an additional approach to deliver STI testing services (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (182). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
| For people with symptoms of: 1) urethral discharge from the penis or 2) anorectal discharge and report receptive anal sex, management is recommended to be based on the results of quality-assured molecular assays. However, in settings with limited or no molecular tests or laboratory capacity, WHO recommends syndromic treatment to ensure treatment on the same day of the visit (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (183). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
| For people who present with genital ulcers (including anorectal ulcers), WHO recommends treatment based on quality-assured molecular assays of the ulcer. However, in settings with limited or no molecular tests or laboratory capacity, WHO recommends syndromic treatment to ensure treatment on the same day of the visit (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (183). |
|
For detailed guidance screening and diagnosis of different STIs please see:
Guidelines for the management of symptomatic sexually transmitted infections
WHO guidelines for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae
WHO guidelines for the treatment of Treponema pallidum (syphilis)
WHO guideline on syphilis screening and treatment for pregnant women
WHO guidelines for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis
WHO guidelines for the treatment of genital herpes simplex virus
|
Hepatitis C testing |
---|
Existing GRADE recommendation
|
In all settings (and regardless of whether delivered through facility- or community-based or self-testing testing), it is recommended that serological testing for HCV antibody (anti-HCV) be offered, with linkage to prevention, confirmatory diagnosis, care and treatment services, to the following individuals (184):
adults and adolescents from populations most affected by HCV infection (i.e., who are either part of a population with high HCV seroprevalence or who have a history of exposure and/or high-risk behaviours for HCV infection) 14; and adults, adolescents and children with a clinical suspicion of chronic viral hepatitis C (i.e., symptoms, signs, laboratory markers).
(strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
For detailed guidance on HCV testing: how to test, how to confirm viraemic HCV infection and which assays to use, please see Guidelines on hepatitis B and C testing.
|
★
New GRADE recommendation
|
People at ongoing risk and a history of treatment-induced or spontaneous clearance of HCV infection may be offered 3–6-monthly testing for presence of HCV viremia (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
Remarks:
Testing should be voluntary and not be used to further stigmatize any populations at ongoing risk. Testing should be offered alongside primary prevention services that are evidence-based and reduce transmission risks, and in combination with appropriate treatment access and linkage. To detect presence of viremic infection, the use of quantitative or qualitative nucleic acid testing (NAT) for detection of HCV RNA, or alternatively an assay to detect HCV core antigen, can be performed.
Further details on evidence, decision-making, implementation considerations and research gaps related to this new recommendation can be found in Chapter 9.
|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| HCV self-testing should be offered as an additional approach to HCV testing services (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (185). |
Hepatitis B testing |
---|
Existing GRADE recommendation
|
In all settings (and regardless of whether delivered through facility- or community-based testing), it is recommended that HBsAg serological testing and linkage to prevention, care and treatment services be offered to the following individuals (184):
adults and adolescents from populations most affected by HBV infection (i.e., who are either part of a population with high HBV seroprevalence or who have a history of exposure and/or high-risk behaviours for HBV infection); adults, adolescents and children with a clinical suspicion of chronic viral hepatitis (i.e., symptoms, signs, laboratory markers); all pregnant women (at least once and as early as possible, ideally at the first ANC visit); and sexual partners, children and other family members, and close household contacts of those with HBV infection.
(strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence)
For detailed guidance on HBV testing and diagnosis, please see Guidelines on hepatitis B and C testing.
|
Treatment |
---|
HIV treatment |
---|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| ART should be initiated in all adults living with HIV, regardless of WHO clinical stage and at any CD4 cell count (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (171). |
|
For detailed guidance on HIV treatment, please see Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring: recommendations for a public health approach.
Please also see the service delivery chapter for details of differentiated service delivery for ART.
|
★
New guidance statement
| Successful ART with viral suppression prevents HIV transmission to sexual partners: there is no transmission when viral load is undetectable or suppressed (less than or equal to 1000 copies/ML) (186–188). |
HIV-associated TB |
---|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| People living with HIV should be systematically screened for TB disease at each visit to a health facility (strong recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) (189). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
|
ART should be started as soon as possible within two weeks of initiating TB treatment, regardless of CD4 cell count, among people living with HIV* (strong recommendation, low-moderate certainty of evidence for adults and adolescents, very low certainty of evidence for children).
*Except when signs and symptoms of meningitis are present
|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| WHO recommends ART for all people with HIV and drug-resistant TB, requiring second-line anti-TB drugs irrespective of CD4 cell count, as early as possible (within the first eight weeks) following initiation of anti-TB treatment (strong recommendation, very low certainty of evidence) (190, 191). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
| Adults and adolescents living with HIV who are unlikely to have active TB should receive TB preventive treatment as part of a comprehensive package of HIV care. Treatment should also be given to those receiving ART, to pregnant women and to those who have previously been treated for TB, irrespective of the degree of immunosuppression, and even if TB infection testing is unavailable (strong recommendation, high certainty evidence) (192). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
| Routine co-trimoxazole prophylaxis should be given to all people living with HIV with active TB disease regardless of CD4 cell count (strong recommendation, high certainty of evidence) (190). |
|
For detailed guidance on TB/HIV, please see Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring: recommendations for a public health approach.
WHO guidelines on TB can be accessed here.
|
STI treatment |
---|
|
STIs disproportionately affect key populations and should be diagnosed and treated in a timely manner following WHO guidelines.
For detailed guidance on treating different STIs please see:
Guidelines for the management of symptomatic sexually transmitted infections
WHO guidelines for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae
WHO guidelines for the treatment of Treponema pallidum (syphilis)
WHO guideline on syphilis screening and treatment for pregnant women
WHO guidelines for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis
WHO guidelines for the treatment of genital herpes simplex virus
|
HCV treatment |
---|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| WHO recommends offering treatment to all individuals diagnosed with HCV infection who are 12 years of age or older, irrespective of disease stage (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence) (193). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
|
WHO recommends the use of pan-genotypic direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for treatment of all adults, adolescents and children aged 3 years and above with chronic hepatitis C virus infection, regardless of stage of disease.
Adults (18 years and above): (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
Adolescents (12–17 years): (strong recommendation; moderate-low certainty of evidence).
For detailed guidance on HCV treatment, please see:
Guidelines for the care and treatment of persons diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and,
Updated recommendations on treatment of adolescents and children with chronic HCV infection and HCV simplified service delivery and HCV diagnostics
|
★
New GRADE recommendation
|
Pan-genotypic DAA-HCV treatment should be offered without delay to people with recently acquired HCV infection and ongoing risk (strong recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
Remarks:
Further details on evidence, decision-making, implementation considerations and research gaps related to this new recommendation can be found in the Chapter 9.
|
HBV treatment |
---|
Existing GRADE recommendation
| As a priority, all adults, adolescents and children with chronic hepatitis B and clinical evidence of compensated or decompensated cirrhosis (or cirrhosis based on APRI score >2 in adults) should be treated, regardless of ALT levels, HBeAg status or HBV DNA levels (194) (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
| Treatment is recommended for adults with chronic hepatitis B who do not have clinical evidence of cirrhosis (or based on APRI score ≤2 in adults), but are aged more than 30 years (in particular), and have persistently abnormal ALT levels and evidence of high-level HBV replication (HBV DNA >20 000 IU/mL), regardless of HBeAg status (194) (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence). |
Existing GRADE recommendation
|
Where HBV DNA is not available: Treatment may be considered based on persistently abnormal ALT levels alone, regardless of HBeAg status (194) (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
For detailed guidance on HBV treatment, please see Guidelines for the prevention, care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B infection.
|