Improving the diagnostic criteria and procedures for chronic fatigue syndrome

Biol Psychol. 2005 Feb;68(2):87-106. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.015.

Abstract

Since the publication of the case definition for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in 1988 the diagnostic criteria have been revised twice in the U.S. None of the case definitions were derived empirically. As a result, there is concern regarding the sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of the criteria. The goal of the present study was to identify methods for improving the diagnostic criteria for CFS. Three groups of 15 participants each were recruited: participants with (1) CFS, (2) major depressive disorder (MDD), and (3) healthy controls. Using statistical procedures, three methods for improving the diagnostic criteria were explored: identification of new diagnostic symptoms, the use of severity ratings for symptomatology, and the identification of standardized measures that differentiate cases of CFS from other conditions. Results of the present study suggest that these three methods hold promise for improving the sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of the diagnostic criteria for CFS.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Affect
  • Cognition
  • Demography
  • Depressive Disorder, Major / diagnosis
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic / diagnosis*
  • Female
  • Health Status
  • Humans
  • Interview, Psychological
  • Male
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • Psychological Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires