Driving simulator sickness: an evidence-based review of the literature

Am J Occup Ther. 2011 Mar-Apr;65(2):179-88. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.000802.

Abstract

Objective: Guided by the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process (2nd edition; American Occupational Therapy Association, 2008), we conducted an evidence-based review on simulator sickness (SS).

Method: We searched Web of Science, PubMed, SafetyLit, Google Scholar, and recently published literature. We used the American Academy of Neurology's classification criteria to extract data from 10 studies and assign each a level of 1-4, with "1" indicating the highest level of evidence. We grouped studies that addressed SS into client factors, context and environment factors, and activity demands.

Results: Client factors (i.e., older clients [>70 yr; Level B], women [Level B]) and context/environment factors (e.g., refresh rates, scenario design and duration, simulator configuration, and calibration; Level B) probably increase the rates of SS, whereas activity demands (vection, speed of driving, and postural instability; Level C) possibly contribute to SS.

Conclusion: We classified factors contributing to SS and identified the need for randomized trials to identify causes of SS.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Automobile Driving*
  • Computer Simulation*
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Psychomotor Performance
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic