Starting lithium prophylaxis early v. late in bipolar disorder

Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;205(3):214-20. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.142802. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

Abstract

Background: No study has investigated when preventive treatment with lithium should be initiated in bipolar disorder.

Aims: To compare response rates among patients with bipolar disorder starting treatment with lithium early v. late.

Method: Nationwide registers were used to identify all patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder in psychiatric hospital settings who were prescribed lithium during the period 1995-2012 in Denmark (n = 4714). Lithium responders were defined as patients who, following a stabilisation lithium start-up period of 6 months, continued lithium monotherapy without being admitted to hospital. Early v. late intervention was defined in two ways: (a) start of lithium following first contact; and (b) start of lithium following a diagnosis of a single manic/mixed episode.

Results: Regardless of the definition used, patients who started lithium early had significantly decreased rates of non-response to lithium compared with the rate for patients starting lithium later (adjusted analyses: first v. later contact: P<0.0001; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-0.91; single manic/mixed episode v. bipolar disorder: P<0.0001; HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84).

Conclusions: Starting lithium treatment early following first psychiatric contact or a single manic/mixed episode is associated with increased probability of lithium response.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antimanic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antimanic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Bipolar Disorder / diagnosis
  • Bipolar Disorder / drug therapy*
  • Denmark
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lithium / administration & dosage
  • Lithium / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Registries
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antimanic Agents
  • Lithium