First genomic insights into members of a candidate bacterial phylum responsible for wastewater bulking

PeerJ. 2015 Jan 27:3:e740. doi: 10.7717/peerj.740. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Filamentous cells belonging to the candidate bacterial phylum KSB3 were previously identified as the causative agent of fatal filament overgrowth (bulking) in a high-rate industrial anaerobic wastewater treatment bioreactor. Here, we obtained near complete genomes from two KSB3 populations in the bioreactor, including the dominant bulking filament, using differential coverage binning of metagenomic data. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with 16S rRNA-targeted probes specific for the two populations confirmed that both are filamentous organisms. Genome-based metabolic reconstruction and microscopic observation of the KSB3 filaments in the presence of sugar gradients indicate that both filament types are Gram-negative, strictly anaerobic fermenters capable of non-flagellar based gliding motility, and have a strikingly large number of sensory and response regulator genes. We propose that the KSB3 filaments are highly sensitive to their surroundings and that cellular processes, including those causing bulking, are controlled by external stimuli. The obtained genomes lay the foundation for a more detailed understanding of environmental cues used by KSB3 filaments, which may lead to more robust treatment options to prevent bulking.

Keywords: Anaerobic biotechnology; Candidate phylum; Filamentous bulking; KSB3 phylum; Metagenomics; Wastewater treatment.

Grants and funding

The study was supported by the Biomedical Research Institute of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST). Philip Hugenholtz and Donovan H. Parks were supported by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Outstanding Researcher Award (DORA) grant DP120103498. Gene W. Tyson was supported by an ARC Queen Elizabeth II Fellowship, grant DP1093175. Donovan H. Parks was also supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.