Can Observation Skills of Citizen Scientists Be Estimated Using Species Accumulation Curves?

PLoS One. 2015 Oct 9;10(10):e0139600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139600. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Volunteers are increasingly being recruited into citizen science projects to collect observations for scientific studies. An additional goal of these projects is to engage and educate these volunteers. Thus, there are few barriers to participation resulting in volunteer observers with varying ability to complete the project's tasks. To improve the quality of a citizen science project's outcomes it would be useful to account for inter-observer variation, and to assess the rarely tested presumption that participating in a citizen science projects results in volunteers becoming better observers. Here we present a method for indexing observer variability based on the data routinely submitted by observers participating in the citizen science project eBird, a broad-scale monitoring project in which observers collect and submit lists of the bird species observed while birding. Our method for indexing observer variability uses species accumulation curves, lines that describe how the total number of species reported increase with increasing time spent in collecting observations. We find that differences in species accumulation curves among observers equates to higher rates of species accumulation, particularly for harder-to-identify species, and reveals increased species accumulation rates with continued participation. We suggest that these properties of our analysis provide a measure of observer skill, and that the potential to derive post-hoc data-derived measurements of participant ability should be more widely explored by analysts of data from citizen science projects. We see the potential for inferential results from analyses of citizen science data to be improved by accounting for observer skill.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animal Distribution
  • Animals
  • Birds* / classification
  • Birds* / physiology
  • Data Collection / methods
  • Humans
  • Observer Variation*
  • Science / methods*
  • Volunteers

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Leon Levy Foundation (http://leonlevyfoundation.org), Seaver Institute, Wolf Creek Foundation, and the National Science Foundation (IIS-1238371 and IIS-1209714). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.