Format

Send to

Choose Destination
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):176-183. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8040.

Personalized Prescription Feedback Using Routinely Collected Data to Reduce Antibiotic Use in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Author information

1
Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
2
Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
3
Clinical Trial Unit, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
4
SASIS AG Solothurn, Switzerland.
5
Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Hygiene, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
6
Centre for Primary Health Care, University of Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Abstract

Importance:

Feedback interventions using routinely collected health data might reduce antibiotic use nationwide without requiring the substantial resources and structural efforts of other antibiotic stewardship programs.

Objective:

To determine if quarterly antibiotic prescription feedback over 2 years reduces antibiotic use when implemented in a complex health care system.

Design, Setting, and Participants:

Pragmatic randomized trial using routinely collected claims data on 2900 primary care physicians with the highest antibiotic prescription rates in Switzerland.

Interventions:

Physicians were randomized to quarterly updated personalized antibiotic prescription feedback over 2 years (n = 1450) or usual care (n = 1450). Feedback was provided both by mail and online from October 2013 to October 2015 and was supported by an initial 1-time provision of evidence-based guidelines.

Main Outcomes and Measures:

The primary outcome was the prescribed defined daily doses (DDD) of any antibiotic to any patient per 100 consultations in the first year analyzed by intention-to-treat. We further analyzed prescriptions of specific antibiotics, age groups, and sex for the first and second year to investigate persistency of effects over time.

Results:

The 2900 physicians had 10 660 124 consultations over 2 years of follow-up, prescribed 1 175 780 packages of antibiotics with 10 290 182 DDD. Physicians receiving feedback prescribed the same amount of antibiotics to all patients in the first year (between-group difference, 0.81%; 95% CI, -2.56% to 4.30%; P = .64) and second year (between-group difference, -1.73%; 95% CI, -5.07% to 1.72%; P = .32) compared with the control group. Prescribing to children aged 6 to 18 years was -8.61% lower in the feedback than in the control group in the first year (95% CI, -14.87% to -1.90%; P = .01). This difference diminished in the second year (between-group difference, -4.10%; 95% CI, -10.78% to 3.07%; P = .25). Physicians receiving feedback prescribed fewer antibiotics to adults aged 19 to 65 years in the second year (between-group difference, -4.59%; 95% CI, -7.91% to -1.16%; P < .01). Prescribing to other patient groups or of specific antibiotic types was not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions and Relevance:

This nationwide antibiotic stewardship program with routine feedback on antibiotic prescribing was not associated with a change of antibiotic use. In older children, adolescents, and younger adults less antibiotics were prescribed, but not consistently over the entire intervention period.

Trial Registration:

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01773824.

PMID:
28027333
DOI:
10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8040
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center