P-mTOR Expression and Implication in Breast Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 23;12(1):e0170302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170302. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Objective: Phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR) is a promising prognostic marker in many types of cancer. However, its survival benefit in patients with breast carcinoma remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between p-mTOR expression and prognosis in breast carcinoma based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Materials and methods: Electronic databases (including Pubmed, Embase, ISI web of science, and Cochrane Library) were searched up to November 24, 2015. The outcome measures were hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between the prognosis of breast carcinoma patients and p-mTOR expression. Primary end points were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Statistical analysis was performed with STATA 12.0.

Results: Nine cohort studies including 3051 patients met full eligibility criteria. The pooled HRs (95% CI) for OS, DFS, and RFS were 0.84 (0.27-2.63), 0.71 (0.40-1.23), and 0.48 (0.20-1.18), respectively.

Conclusions: Our findings suggested that p-mTOR overexpression was not significantly related to prognosis in breast carcinoma regarding OS and disease recurrence. Prospective studies are warranted to examine the association between p-mTOR expression and survival outcomes in breast carcinoma.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Breast Neoplasms / metabolism*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Survival Analysis
  • TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases / metabolism*

Substances

  • MTOR protein, human
  • TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Grants and funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81370364, 71673254), Science and Technology Innovation Team in Universities of Henan province (no. 16IRTSTHN021). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.