Psychiatric History, Deployments, and Potential Impacts of Mental Health Care in a Combat Theater

Introduction: Increasing numbers of U.S. service members access mental health care while deployed and at home station. Multiple deployments carry with them a higher risk of exposure to combat as well as the impact of cumulative stressors associated with separation from family, hostile environments, and high operations tempo. However, mental health care resources continue to be underutilized, potentially because of higher levels of stigma regarding mental health care and concerns about career impact among service members. Some studies indicate that service members who have previously sought mental health care are likely to continue to do so proactively as needed. This study examined the associations between prior deployments, prior mental health treatment, and subsequent career-impacting recommendations (e.g., duty limitations and medical evacuation) among deployed service members seeking mental health care. Materials and.

Methods: This study is a retrospective review of clinical records from three U.S. military Combat and Operational Stress Control units in Afghanistan. Data were drawn from the mental health records of 1,639 Army service members presenting for outpatient mental health services while deployed in Afghanistan from years 2006 to 2008.

Results: In an unadjusted logistic regression model, service members with at least one prior deployment had a 38% greater odds (odds ratio [OR] = 1.38, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.06, 1.80; p < 0.05) of receiving career-impacting recommendations than those without a prior deployment. However, after adjusting for demographics (age, gender, marital status, rank, and military status), there was no association between prior deployments and career-impacting recommendations (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.78, 1.43; p = 0.716). In the second unadjusted model, service members with prior mental health treatment had a 57% lower odds (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.34, 0.56; p < 0.001) of receiving career-impacting recommendations than those without prior mental health treatment. After adjusting for demographics and number of prior deployments, service members with prior mental health treatment had a 58% lower odds (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.33, 0.56; p < 0.001) of receiving career-impacting recommendations than those without prior mental health treatment.

Conclusion: Among service members who had a clinical mental health encounter, prior deployment was not associated with career-impacting recommendations and prior mental health treatment appeared to be protective against career-impacting recommendations. These results are in line with research indicating that service members who have previous experience with mental health care tend to seek help sooner than those without prior treatment. Those service members who had previously sought care were more likely to express decreased stigma and seek mental health care while deployed. Consequently, service members who have prior mental health treatment may seek care before their concerns become marked enough to warrant duty-limiting recommendations to command. These findings have important implications for campaigns to reduce stigma and promote early help-seeking among service members. Efforts should continue to study and respectively make known the rates of career impact with the goal of increased early service utilization and increased ability to sustain service members' military readiness and personal functioning.