Correlation between pubic bone mineral density and age from a computed tomography sample

Forensic Sci Int. 2019 May:298:345-350. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 16.

Abstract

In forensic anthropology, the estimation of age at death is mainly required to establish a biological profile and facilitate individual identification. The Suchey-Brooks (SB) system represents one of the most commonly used and tested methods of assessment based on the morphological characteristics of the pubic symphysis. However, this method has certain drawbacks, including frequently inaccurate estimation for older individuals. The aim of this work was to test the evolution of pubic bone mineral density (BMD) according to age, especially for individuals over 40 years old. We retrospectively studied pubic bones from males (n = 88) and females (n = 113) over 40 years of age undergoing clinical multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in a French hospital between November 2017 and April 2018. The results revealed a significant negative correlation between BMD and age for males (R = -0.62) and females (R = -0.55). The intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of the phase allocation were moderate for males (kappa values at 0.72 and 0.65) and strong for females (kappa values at 0.93 and 0.86). Moreover, a significant difference in BMD between stages 6-1 and 6-2 for males was observed. We hypothesize that BMD might help improve the reliability of the SB system for older individuals. In addition to the pubic bone, numerous other anatomical regions such as the area of Ward could represent interesting areas of study in order to relate bone density to age.

Keywords: Aging; Bone mineral density; Forensic anthropology; Pubic bone; Suchey–Brooks method.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Determination by Skeleton / methods*
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bone Density*
  • Female
  • Forensic Anthropology
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multidetector Computed Tomography
  • Pubic Bone / diagnostic imaging*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies