Is inspiratory muscle training (IMT) an acceptable treatment option for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have declined pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and can IMT enhance PR uptake? A single-group prepost feasibility study in a home-based setting

BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 8;9(8):e028507. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028507.

Abstract

Objectives: This feasibility study aimed to assess the acceptability of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who declined pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) as a potential treatment option or precursor to PR. Objectives were to assess attitudes to IMT, PR and alternatives to PR; factors influencing adherence with IMT and acceptability of outcome measures, research tools and study protocol.

Design: A pragmatic, mixed methods, prepost feasibility study was conducted. Recruitment took place over a 4-month period. Participants were followed up for a period of 6 months.

Settings: IMT sessions and assessments were conducted in the domiciliary setting.

Participants: Inclusion criteria: people over the age of 35, stable COPD, Medical Research Council Dyspnoea scale of 3 or above, declined PR.

Exclusion criteria: history of spontaneous pneumothorax, incomplete recovery from a traumatic pneumothorax, asthma, known recently perforated eardrum, unstable angina, ventricular dysrhythmias, cerebrovascular event or myocardial infarction within the last 2 months. Participants were selected from a purposive sample. Of the 22 potential participants screened, 11 were recruited and interviewed. Ten participants commenced IMT. Seven participants completed the follow-up assessment.

Intervention: Eight weeks of IMT twice a day, 5 days a week with visits once weekly by a physiotherapist. Unsupervised IMT twice a day three times a week until follow-up at 6 months.

Outcomes: Acceptability of IMT and the study process was explored via semi-structured interviews. Adherence with IMT was assessed by the Powerbreathe K3 device and participant diaries. Uptake of PR was identified.

Results: IMT was found to be acceptable. Adherence was explored. Four people went on to participate in PR.

Conclusions: Feasibility was established. A randomised controlled trial is warranted to establish efficacy and cost-effectiveness of IMT in those who decline PR and IMT as an intervention to promote uptake of PR.

Trial registration number: NCT01956565; Post-results.

Keywords: adherence; chronic airways disease; inspiratory muscle training; pulmonary rehabilitation; rehabilitation medicine; uptake.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Breathing Exercises / methods*
  • Exercise Therapy / methods
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Forced Expiratory Volume
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Maximal Respiratory Pressures
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care*
  • Patient Compliance
  • Patient Education as Topic / methods
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / physiopathology
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / rehabilitation*
  • Treatment Refusal
  • Vital Capacity

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01956565