Objective: In the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD), computed tomography (CT) is the only imaging method. The aims of the study were to show that reformat images are more accurate than standard planes for diagnosis of SSCD and to determine the prevalence of SSCD.
Methods: The retrospective review yielded 1309 temporal CTs performed in our radiology department for any reason. Two radiologist interpreted CTs in standard planes collaboratively. Patients with SSCD were reinterpreted in Pöschl and Stenvers planes by 2 radiologists separately.
Results: Statistical analysis was made by accepting that 2 radiologists diagnosis were accurate in Pöschl plane. Coronal plane sensitivity 86%, specificity 64%, Stenvers plane sensitivity 96%, and specificity 52% have been found in the mean result of 2 observers (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: In the diagnosis of SSCD, standard and Stenvers planes can cause false-negative and false-positive diagnoses. Interpretation in Pöschl plane can significantly increase sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive values for diagnosing dehiscence.