A survey on colonoscopy shows poor understanding of its protective value and widespread misconceptions across Europe

PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233490. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy is a valuable screening tool for colorectal cancer. However, patients experience anxiety when faced with attending a first colonoscopy, and negative attitudes may contribute to non-attendance. Few studies in Europe have explored these attitudes, despite increasing colorectal cancer incidence.

Study aim: We conducted an online survey of the public in five European Union countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK), with the aim of understanding public knowledge of, perceptions of, and attitudes towards, colonoscopy and bowel preparation, amongst colonoscopy-naïve respondents. Attitudes towards colonoscopy were also gathered from colonoscopy-experienced patients.

Methods: Survey answers were gathered from 2,500 colonoscopy-naïve respondents and 500 colonoscopy-experienced patients, divided equally between countries.

Results: Across Europe, 72% of colonoscopy-naïve respondents showed receptiveness to colonoscopy if advised by their doctor to receive one, but only 45% understood its use to prevent colorectal cancer. Forty-three percent of colonoscopy-experienced respondents would still be embarrassed about having another colonoscopy, although 59% said that the experience had been better than expected. Colonoscopy-experienced respondents had greater aversion to bowel preparation than colonoscopy-naïve respondents (47% vs 26%), and 67% of colonoscopy-naïve respondents thought that only 1 litre of bowel preparation or less is required. Italians and the Spanish wanted more information than on average in Europe, while Germans had more realistic expectations of bowel preparation.

Discussion: There are perceptual gaps amongst the public around the purpose of colonoscopies, the subjective experience of the colonoscopy procedure, and the quantity of bowel preparation needed. These concerns could be mitigated by better education and using lower-volume bowel preparation techniques.

Conclusion: Europeans would have a colonoscopy, but its preventive medical purpose is poorly understood and there are misconceptions around the process. Further education about the procedure, its benefits and bowel preparation is vital to improve understanding and compliance.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cathartics / therapeutic use
  • Colonoscopy*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Early Detection of Cancer / methods*
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged

Substances

  • Cathartics

Grants and funding

Norgine Ltd. funded the survey but were not involved in data collection or analysis. The funders provided input on the preparation of the manuscript and decision to publish. Author Bharat Amlani is an employee of Norgine Ltd. and was involved in the decision to publish and in the preparation of the manuscript. Medical writing of the manuscript and editorial support, provided by Meer Basharat, PhD of TVF Communications, were funded by Norgine Ltd.