In vitro and in vivo characterization of a novel tricalcium silicate-based ink for bone regeneration using laser-assisted bioprinting

Biofabrication. 2022 Mar 9;14(2). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac584b.

Abstract

Grafts aside, current strategies employed to overcome bone loss still fail to reproduce native tissue physiology. Among the emerging bioprinting strategies, laser-assisted bioprinting (LAB) offers very high resolution, allowing designing micrometric patterns in a contactless manner, providing a reproducible tool to test ink formulation. To this date, no LAB associated ink succeeded to provide a reproduciblead integrumbone regeneration on a murine calvaria critical size defect model. Using the Conformité Européenne (CE) approved BioRoot RCS® as a mineral addition to a collagen-enriched ink compatible with LAB, the present study describes the process of the development of a solidifying tricalcium silicate-based ink as a new bone repair promoting substrates in a LAB model. This ink formulation was mechanically characterized by rheology to adjust it for LAB. Printed aside stromal cells from apical papilla (SCAPs), this ink demonstrated a great cytocompatibility, with significantin vitropositive impact upon cell motility, and an early osteogenic differentiation response in the absence of another stimulus. Results indicated that thein vivoapplication of this new ink formulation to regenerate critical size bone defect tends to promote the formation of bone volume fraction without affecting the vascularization of the neo-formed tissue. The use of LAB techniques with this ink failed to demonstrate a complete bone repair, whether SCAPs were printed or not of at its direct proximity. The relevance of the properties of this specific ink formulation would therefore rely on the quantity appliedin situas a defect filler rather than its cell modulation properties observedin vitro. For the first time, a tricalcium silicate-based printed ink, based on rheological analysis, was characterizedin vitroandin vivo, giving valuable information to reach complete bone regeneration through formulation updates. This LAB-based process could be generalized to normalize the characterization of candidate ink for bone regeneration.

Keywords: bioink; bone repair; in vivo; ink; laser-assisted bioprinting; tissue engineering; tricalcium silicate.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bioprinting* / methods
  • Bone Regeneration
  • Calcium Compounds
  • Ink
  • Lasers
  • Mice
  • Osteogenesis
  • Printing, Three-Dimensional
  • Silicates
  • Tissue Engineering / methods
  • Tissue Scaffolds / chemistry

Substances

  • Calcium Compounds
  • Silicates
  • tricalcium silicate