U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Duarte A, Mebrahtu T, Goncalves PS, et al. Adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab for treating plaque psoriasis in children and young people: systematic review and economic evaluation. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Nov. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 21.64.)

Cover of Adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab for treating plaque psoriasis in children and young people: systematic review and economic evaluation

Adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab for treating plaque psoriasis in children and young people: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Show details

Chapter 2Definition of the decision problem

According to NICE guideline CG153 in England,11 psoriasis patients are treated in three stages. First-line therapy includes traditional topical therapies (such as corticosteroids, vitamin D and vitamin D analogues, dithranol and tar preparations). Second-line therapies include the phototherapies NBUVB light and PUVA and systemic non-biological agents such as ciclosporin, methotrexate and acitretin. Systemic biological therapies such as the TNF antagonists adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab and the monoclonal antibody ustekinumab, which targets IL-12 and IL-23, can be provided as third-line therapy.

The three biologics that have regulatory approval for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in children and young people (adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab) have not yet been appraised by NICE and no NICE technology appraisal (TA) guidance is available for treating children and adolescents in the UK with these treatments for this indication.

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab within their respective licensed indications for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in children and young people.

Note

This report contains reference to confidential information provided as part of the NICE appraisal process. This information has been removed from the report and the results, discussions and conclusions of the report do not include the confidential information. These sections are clearly marked in the report.

Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2017. This work was produced by Duarte et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.
Bookshelf ID: NBK464260

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.8M)

In this Page

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...